SAMEENA BANU vs THE COMMISSIONER — 499/2026
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3)B. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 16th May 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAMS510014442026
Filing Number
411/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
499/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD
Judge
1098-II ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD
Decision Date
16th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SAMEENA BANU
Adv. SOMASHEKAR.B
Respondent(s)
THE COMMISSIONER
Hearing History
Judge: 1098-II ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD
Disposed
ORDERS
ORDERS
ORDERS
ORDERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 14-05-2026 | ORDERS |
| 07-05-2026 | ORDERS |
| 02-05-2026 | ORDERS |
| 30-04-2026 | ORDERS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Crl.Misc./499/2026 Court Decision: The court allowed the petition and directed the Registrar of Birth and Death to register and issue a birth certificate for Sameena Banu (born 01.04.1985). The court found that the petitioner's testimony, supported by an Aadhar card and school transfer certificate, sufficiently established the fact of birth, and the respondent failed to provide justifiable grounds for rejection. Key Reasoning: Under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births & Deaths Act, 1969, the court's concern is with establishing the factum of birth rather than the exact date. Since the respondent failed to appear and contest the petition, no defense was presented against the petitioner's sworn testimony that she was born on 01.04.1985 at Nanjangud. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Crl.Misc./499/2026 Court Decision: The court allowed the petition and directed the Registrar of Birth and Death to register and issue a birth certificate for Sameena Banu (born 01.04.1985). The court found that the petitioner's testimony, supported by an Aadhar card and school transfer certificate, sufficiently established the fact of birth, and the respondent failed to provide justifiable grounds for rejection. Key Reasoning: Under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births & Deaths Act, 1969, the court's concern is with establishing the factum of birth rather than the exact date. Since the respondent failed to appear and contest the petition, no defense was presented against the petitioner's sworn testimony that she was born on 01.04.1985 at Nanjangud. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts