SRI VEERASHYVA CREDIT CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY vs D.M. LOKESH — 508/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAMS510014002025
Filing Number
507/2025
Filing Date
03-Apr-2025
Registration No
508/2025
Registration Date
03-Apr-2025
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD
Judge
1098-II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SRI VEERASHYVA CREDIT CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY
Adv. BASAVARAJU. C.L.
Respondent(s)
-
1.D.M. LOKESH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case 508/2025 Summary: The Lok Adalat accepted a mutual compromise settlement between SRI VEERASHYVA CREDIT CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY (petitioner) and D.M. LOKESH (respondent), disposing the case as settled and not pressed. The court found the compromise memo, duly signed by both parties, satisfactory and accepted it in the interest of justice and equity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
07-Feb-2026
For Settlement
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
28-Jan-2026
NBW To Accused
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
18-Nov-2025
NBW To Accused
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
27-Sep-2025
NBW To Accused
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
05-Aug-2025
NBW To Accused
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
07-Jul-2025
Appearance Of Accussed
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
03-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 508/2025
Case 508/2025 Summary: The Lok Adalat accepted a mutual compromise settlement between SRI VEERASHYVA CREDIT CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY (petitioner) and D.M. LOKESH (respondent), disposing the case as settled and not pressed. The court found the compromise memo, duly signed by both parties, satisfactory and accepted it in the interest of justice and equity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts