STATE BY NANJANGUD RURAL PS vs VISHWANATHA — 651/2019

Case under Ipc Cases Section 143,147,148,448,504,341,323,324,354,342. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 21st July 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 21-Jul-2026

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAMS510014002019

Filing Number

651/2019

Filing Date

24-Apr-2019

Registration No

651/2019

Registration Date

24-Apr-2019

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD

Judge

449-Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

03NRP

Police Station

NANJANAGUD RURAL PS

Year

2018

Acts & Sections

Ipc Cases Section 143,147,148,448,504,341,323,324,354,342

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE BY NANJANGUD RURAL PS (Police Station)

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VISHWANATHA

  2. 2.KRISHNA

  3. 3.NANDISHA

  4. 4.MAHESHA

  5. 5.CHINNASWAMY ALIAS RANGASWAMY

  6. 6.BALU

  7. 7.SUNIL

  8. 8.A9. GIRISHA

  9. 9.A10. RAJU

  10. 10.A11. SURESHA

  11. 11.A12. RAMESHA

  12. 12.A13. GOPI

  13. 13.A14. SHIVARAJU

  14. 14.A15. SHIVARAJU

  15. 15.A16. KISHOR

  16. 16.A17. RAJANNA

  17. 17.A18. MAHADEVASWAMY

  18. 18.A19. BASAVARAJU

  19. 19.A20. CHIKKAYAJAMANA SIDDARAJU

  20. 20.A21. SHAMBAIAH

Case History

  1. 21-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-May-2026

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Case 651/2019 Summary: A witness testified on 17.03.2026 regarding an incident from 01.01.2018 involving a dispute over religious prayers at his home in Nanjangud. The witness (identified as Siddaraju, age 58, a guard) initially provided testimony supporting the prosecution's allegations that the accused unlawfully assembled, trespassed into his home, assaulted family members (particularly his wife and daughter), and attempted to molest his daughter. However, during cross-examination, the witness substantially recanted his testimony, denying that the accused committed any of the alleged offenses and stating he had settled the matter with them. The court treated him as a hostile/adverse witness and permitted cross-examination, resulting in portions of his statement being marked as evidence (NI.PI-5). The case proceeded with the witness's credibility significantly compromised by his contradictory statements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  7. 11-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  8. 24-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  9. 24-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  10. 05-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  11. 24-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  12. 06-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  13. 16-May-2025

    ChargeView PDF

  14. 16-May-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  15. 09-Apr-2025

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  16. 12-Feb-2025

    Re-Issue NBW

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  17. 02-Dec-2024

    NBW To Accused

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  18. 16-Oct-2024

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  19. 03-Jul-2024

    NBW To Accused

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  20. 08-Apr-2024

    NBW To Accused

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  21. 18-Dec-2023

    Hearing

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  22. 16-Aug-2023

    Hearing

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  23. 26-Apr-2023

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  24. 10-Jan-2023

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  25. 08-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  26. 06-Oct-2022

    Appearance Of Accussed

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  27. 28-Jul-2022

    Re-Issue Summons

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  28. 20-Apr-2022

    Re-Issue Summons

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  29. 03-Jan-2022

    Re-Issue Summons

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  30. 30-Oct-2021

    Re-Issue Summons

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  31. 16-Aug-2021

    Re-Issue Summons

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  32. 21-Jun-2021

    Re-Issue Summons

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  33. 19-Jun-2021

    Re-Issue Summons

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  34. 12-Mar-2021

    Re-Issue Summons

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  35. 11-Dec-2020

    Re-Issue Summons

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  36. 04-Sep-2020

    Re-Issue Summons

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  37. 12-Jun-2020

    Re-Issue Summons

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  38. 07-Dec-2019

    Re-Issue Summons

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  39. 08-Aug-2019

    Ss To Accused

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  40. 25-Apr-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  41. 24-Apr-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 651/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Case 651/2019 Summary: A witness testified on 17.03.2026 regarding an incident from 01.01.2018 involving a dispute over religious prayers at his home in Nanjangud. The witness (identified as Siddaraju, age 58, a guard) initially provided testimony supporting the prosecution's allegations that the accused unlawfully assembled, trespassed into his home, assaulted family members (particularly his wife and daughter), and attempted to molest his daughter. However, during cross-examination, the witness substantially recanted his testimony, denying that the accused committed any of the alleged offenses and stating he had settled the matter with them. The court treated him as a hostile/adverse witness and permitted cross-examination, resulting in portions of his statement being marked as evidence (NI.PI-5). The case proceeded with the witness's credibility significantly compromised by his contradictory statements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case