JAVARASHETTY vs THE THAHASILDHAR — 402/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3)B. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 04th April 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAMS510008392026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

313/2026

Filing Date

16-02-2026

Registration No

402/2026

Registration Date

17-02-2026

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD

Judge

449-PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD

Decision Date

04th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Acts & Sections

REGISTRATION OF BIRTHS AND DEATHS ACT Section 13(3)B

Petitioner(s)

JAVARASHETTY

Adv. NAVEENA M R

SHIVARAJU

Respondent(s)

THE THAHASILDHAR

Hearing History

Judge: 449-PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD

04-04-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

NOTICE TO RESPONDENT

17-02-2026

NOTICE TO RESPONDENT

Final Orders / Judgements

04-04-2026
Orders

Summary The court granted the petitioner's application under Section 13 of the Registration of Deaths and Marriages Act, 1969, directing the registrar to register the death of Srimati Kalama Kom Late Devashetti (died 15.06.2017) and issue a death certificate. The court found sufficient evidence through the petitioner's testimony and supporting documents (family tree, Aadhar card, and public notice) that the death occurred but was never registered, with no contradictory evidence presented by the respondent registrar. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

04-04-2026

Deposition

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court granted the petitioner's application under Section 13 of the Registration of Deaths and Marriages Act, 1969, directing the registrar to register the death of Srimati Kalama Kom Late Devashetti (died 15.06.2017) and issue a death certificate. The court found sufficient evidence through the petitioner's testimony and supporting documents (family tree, Aadhar card, and public notice) that the death occurred but was never registered, with no contradictory evidence presented by the respondent registrar. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case