JAVARASHETTY vs THE THAHASILDHAR — 402/2026
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3)B. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 04th April 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAMS510008392026
Filing Number
313/2026
Filing Date
16-Feb-2026
Registration No
402/2026
Registration Date
17-Feb-2026
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD
Judge
449-Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
Decision Date
04-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 08-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JAVARASHETTY
Adv. NAVEENA M R
-
2.SHIVARAJU
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE THAHASILDHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-Apr-2026
OrdersView PDF
Summary The court granted the petitioner's application under Section 13 of the Registration of Deaths and Marriages Act, 1969, directing the registrar to register the death of Srimati Kalama Kom Late Devashetti (died 15.06.2017) and issue a death certificate. The court found sufficient evidence through the petitioner's testimony and supporting documents (family tree, Aadhar card, and public notice) that the death occurred but was never registered, with no contradictory evidence presented by the respondent registrar. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Apr-2026
Deposition
-
04-Apr-2026
Disposed
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
07-Mar-2026
Notice To Respondent
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
17-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 402/2026
Summary The court granted the petitioner's application under Section 13 of the Registration of Deaths and Marriages Act, 1969, directing the registrar to register the death of Srimati Kalama Kom Late Devashetti (died 15.06.2017) and issue a death certificate. The court found sufficient evidence through the petitioner's testimony and supporting documents (family tree, Aadhar card, and public notice) that the death occurred but was never registered, with no contradictory evidence presented by the respondent registrar. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts