SRIKANTESHWARA T.V. CENTER REPT BY MANAGER CHANDRA B S vs VEENA B.M — 165/2023
Case under Under Sec. 200 of Cr.p.c R/w 138 , 142 of N.i Act. Section 200. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 10th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAMS510008392023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
166/2023
Filing Date
06-03-2023
Registration No
165/2023
Registration Date
06-03-2023
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD
Judge
1098-II ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SRIKANTESHWARA T.V. CENTER REPT BY MANAGER CHANDRA B S
Adv. KIRANKUMAR M
Respondent(s)
VEENA B.M
Hearing History
Judge: 1098-II ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD
Disposed
SS TO ACCUSED
SS TO ACCUSED
SS TO ACCUSED
SS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | SS TO ACCUSED | |
| 07-03-2026 | SS TO ACCUSED | |
| 11-02-2026 | SS TO ACCUSED | |
| 29-11-2025 | SS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary: The II Additional Civil Judge and JMFC at Nanjangud dismissed the case due to the complainant's persistent absence and failure to prosecute despite multiple opportunities provided by the court between 11:30 AM and 5:30 PM. The court found this demonstrated a clear lack of interest in pursuing the matter, making further proceedings purposeless. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary: The II Additional Civil Judge and JMFC at Nanjangud dismissed the case due to the complainant's persistent absence and failure to prosecute despite multiple opportunities provided by the court between 11:30 AM and 5:30 PM. The court found this demonstrated a clear lack of interest in pursuing the matter, making further proceedings purposeless. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts