PUTTASIDDAMMA vs THE TAHASILDAR/REGISTRAR OF BIRTH AND DEATH — 372/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 28th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAMS510007582026

Filing Number

283/2026

Filing Date

10-Feb-2026

Registration No

372/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD

Judge

449-Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

Decision Date

28-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 08-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3)

Petitioner(s)

1.PUTTASIDDAMMA

Adv. RAJENDRA
2.MAHADEVU
3.MAHADEVI
4.SHIVANNA

Respondent(s)

1.THE TAHASILDAR/REGISTRAR OF BIRTH AND DEATH

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
28-Mar-2026

OrdersView PDF
28-Mar-2026

DepositionView PDF

The court (Civil Misc. Case No. 372/2026, Nanjangud, Mysore District) recorded witness testimony from Mahadev (age 60, farmer) regarding his mother's death on 28.11.2016 and related public notice proceedings. The court admitted documentary evidence including property records, Aadhar card copies, and newspaper publications as exhibits, and proceeded to hear arguments on the petitioner's claims for relief as sought in the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
28-Mar-2026

Disposed

Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
07-Mar-2026

Notice To Respondent

Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
11-Feb-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
10-Feb-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 372/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court (Civil Misc. Case No. 372/2026, Nanjangud, Mysore District) recorded witness testimony from Mahadev (age 60, farmer) regarding his mother's death on 28.11.2016 and related public notice proceedings. The court admitted documentary evidence including property records, Aadhar card copies, and newspaper publications as exhibits, and proceeded to hear arguments on the petitioner's claims for relief as sought in the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.