AMAN ULLAKHAN vs THE THAHASILDHAR — 366/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 13th March 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAMS510007492026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

276/2026

Filing Date

09-02-2026

Registration No

366/2026

Registration Date

11-02-2026

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD

Judge

450-I ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

REGISTRATION OF BIRTHS AND DEATHS ACT Section 13(3)(B)

Petitioner(s)

AMAN ULLAKHAN

Adv. SRI. M. MAHESH

ABDUL MUJEEDKHAN

NASULLA KHAN

HASINABEGAM

Respondent(s)

THE THAHASILDHAR

Hearing History

Judge: 450-I ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD

13-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

FOR ENQUIRY

11-02-2026

NOTICE TO RESPONDENT

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Orders

The court allowed the petition filed under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, and directed the Tahasildar to register the death of Ameena Bi Amma (grandmother of the petitioners) as occurring on 11.02.1984 in the death register. The court found that the petitioners had made out sufficient grounds for late registration, given their good faith ignorance of the procedure, the unchallenged evidence, public notice in the newspaper without objections, and that no injustice would result from allowing the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the petition filed under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, and directed the Tahasildar to register the death of Ameena Bi Amma (grandmother of the petitioners) as occurring on 11.02.1984 in the death register. The court found that the petitioners had made out sufficient grounds for late registration, given their good faith ignorance of the procedure, the unchallenged evidence, public notice in the newspaper without objections, and that no injustice would result from allowing the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case