AMAN ULLAKHAN vs THE THAHASIDLHAR — 363/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAMS510007462026

Filing Number

273/2026

Filing Date

09-Feb-2026

Registration No

363/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD

Judge

450-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 08-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3)(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AMAN ULLAKHAN

    Adv. SRI. M. MAHESH

  2. 2.ABDUL MUJEEDKHAN

  3. 3.NASURALLA KHAN

  4. 4.HASINABEGAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE THAHASIDLHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Orders

    The court allowed the petitioners' petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Tahasildar to register the death of Ghouse Khan (the petitioners' grandfather) dated 12.07.1978. The court found the petitioners had sufficient grounds for registration, supported by unchallenged evidence and public notice, and that no injustice would result from allowing the petition despite the respondent's non-appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    For Enquiry

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 363/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the petitioners' petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Tahasildar to register the death of Ghouse Khan (the petitioners' grandfather) dated 12.07.1978. The court found the petitioners had sufficient grounds for registration, supported by unchallenged evidence and public notice, and that no injustice would result from allowing the petition despite the respondent's non-appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case