SARVAMANGALA vs THE THAHASILDHAR/REGISTRAR OF BIRTH AND DEATH — 336/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 28th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAMS510006362026

Filing Number

248/2026

Filing Date

04-Feb-2026

Registration No

336/2026

Registration Date

05-Feb-2026

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD

Judge

449-Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

Decision Date

28-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 08-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3)

Petitioner(s)

1.SARVAMANGALA

Adv. RAJENDRA.
2.MAHADEVAMMA

Respondent(s)

1.THE THAHASILDHAR/REGISTRAR OF BIRTH AND DEATH

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
28-Mar-2026

Orders
28-Mar-2026

Deposition

The court accepted the witness testimony of Suryamangala regarding her deceased father Madaprasad (died 04.10.1970) and admitted documentary evidence including Aadhar card and newspaper publication notices as exhibits. The court found the petitioner's claims substantiated through the witness statement and supporting documents, and proceeded to grant the relief sought in the petition as the opposing party made no counter-arguments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
28-Mar-2026

Disposed

Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
07-Mar-2026

Notice To Respondent

Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
05-Feb-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
04-Feb-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 336/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court accepted the witness testimony of Suryamangala regarding her deceased father Madaprasad (died 04.10.1970) and admitted documentary evidence including Aadhar card and newspaper publication notices as exhibits. The court found the petitioner's claims substantiated through the witness statement and supporting documents, and proceeded to grant the relief sought in the petition as the opposing party made no counter-arguments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.