N MANJUNATH vs M BASAVARAJU — 61/2013
Case under U/o 43 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 0. Status: HEARING ON IA. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS510002922013
Next Hearing
24th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
61/2013
Filing Date
29-01-2013
Registration No
61/2013
Registration Date
30-01-2013
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD
Judge
1098-II ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
N MANJUNATH
Adv. BY
Respondent(s)
M BASAVARAJU
SMT. JAYALAKSHMI
CHAYAKUMARI,
MAHADEVAPRASAD
Hearing History
Judge: 1098-II ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD
HEARING ON IA
HEARING ON IA
HEARING ON IA
FOR OBJECTION
FOR OBJECTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | HEARING ON IA | |
| 07-03-2026 | HEARING ON IA | |
| 02-03-2026 | HEARING ON IA | |
| 26-02-2026 | FOR OBJECTION | |
| 12-02-2026 | FOR OBJECTION |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a civil case (O.S. No. 61-2013) before the 2nd Additional First Class Judicial Magistrate's Court, Nanjangud. The court recorded the testimony of witness Shrikantha Moorthy regarding a financial transaction involving Rs. 1,00,000, of which Rs. 85,000 was paid to the plaintiff and Rs. 15,000 remained pending via cheque. The court found issues with the witness's credibility, noting inconsistencies in his testimony and concerns that he may have provided false evidence to assist the defendant. The case was adjourned for further proceedings with no final order passed on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a civil case (O.S. No. 61-2013) before the 2nd Additional First Class Judicial Magistrate's Court, Nanjangud. The court recorded the testimony of witness Shrikantha Moorthy regarding a financial transaction involving Rs. 1,00,000, of which Rs. 85,000 was paid to the plaintiff and Rs. 15,000 remained pending via cheque. The court found issues with the witness's credibility, noting inconsistencies in his testimony and concerns that he may have provided false evidence to assist the defendant. The case was adjourned for further proceedings with no final order passed on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts