CHIKKANNA vs MAHADEVA NAIKA — 46/2025

OrdersView PDF

The court allowed the compromise petition filed by petitioner Chikkanna and respondents Mahadeva Naika, Puttamma, and Mahesha under Order 23 Rule 3 of CPC, finding that both parties had amicably settled their dispute and agreed to the compromise terms, which were lawful and in the parties' interests. The suit was decreed in accordance with the compromise petition, with the compromise petition forming part of the final decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Disposed

II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

Evidence

II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

Evidence

II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

Evidence

II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

Evidence

II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

For Written Statement

II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

For Written Statement

II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

For Written Statement

II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

For Written Statement

II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

Summons To Defendant/S

II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

Summons To Defendant/S

II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

Summons To Defendant/S

II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled

Case filed

Registration No. 46/2025