APSARI vs SOMA NAYAK — 39/2023
Case under Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 7R1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS510001712023
Filing Number
39/2023
Filing Date
13-Jan-2023
Registration No
39/2023
Registration Date
16-Jan-2023
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD
Judge
1098-II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.APSARI
Adv. UMESHA. N.
-
2.ASMA APSARI
Respondent(s)
-
1.SOMA NAYAK
-
2.KENCHA NAYAK
Case History
-
20-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
23-Apr-2026
DepositionView PDF
Case Summary: O.S. 39/2023 Court: 2nd Additional First Class Judicial Magistrate, Nanjangud Parties: APSARI and ASMA APSARI (Petitioners) v. SOMA NAYAK and KENCHA NAYAK (Respondents) Outcome: Case dismissed. The court found that the petitioners failed to establish their claims regarding ownership and sale of the scheduled property (Survey No. 215/3, measuring 1 acre 2 gunta). The court determined that the respondent had no legal right to sell the property as it remained in the name of a third party (Himamsa), and the deed of gift relied upon was not authenticated. The witness testimony was insufficient to prove the alleged transactions. Case adjourned with no further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Apr-2026
Evidence
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
19-Feb-2026
Evidence
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
17-Jan-2026
Evidence
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
15-Jan-2026
Evidence
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
31-Oct-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
31-Oct-2025
Evidence
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
12-Sep-2025
Evidence
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
24-Jul-2025
Evidence
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
05-Jul-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
05-Jul-2025
Evidence
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
27-Jun-2025
Evidence
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
24-Apr-2025
Evidence
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
03-Apr-2025
Evidence
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
21-Feb-2025
Evidence
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
06-Feb-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
06-Feb-2025
Evidence
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
23-Jan-2025
Evidence
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
19-Dec-2024
Evidence
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
15-Nov-2024
Evidence
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
26-Sep-2024
Evidence
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
23-Aug-2024
DepositionView PDF
-
23-Aug-2024
Evidence
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
02-Aug-2024
Evidence
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
11-Jul-2024
Evidence
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
28-Jun-2024
Evidence
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
05-Apr-2024
Evidence
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
22-Feb-2024
Evidence
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
14-Dec-2023
List Of Witness And Documents
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
16-Nov-2023
Issues
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
10-Oct-2023
For Complainance
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
30-Sep-2023
Orders
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
21-Sep-2023
Hearing On IA
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
14-Sep-2023
Objection To IA
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
07-Sep-2023
DepositionView PDF
-
07-Sep-2023
Judgement
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
03-Jun-2023
Evidence
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
20-Apr-2023
For Written Statement
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
03-Mar-2023
For Written Statement
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
16-Jan-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Jan-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 39/2023
Case Summary: O.S. 39/2023 Court: 2nd Additional First Class Judicial Magistrate, Nanjangud Parties: APSARI and ASMA APSARI (Petitioners) v. SOMA NAYAK and KENCHA NAYAK (Respondents) Outcome: Case dismissed. The court found that the petitioners failed to establish their claims regarding ownership and sale of the scheduled property (Survey No. 215/3, measuring 1 acre 2 gunta). The court determined that the respondent had no legal right to sell the property as it remained in the name of a third party (Himamsa), and the deed of gift relied upon was not authenticated. The witness testimony was insufficient to prove the alleged transactions. Case adjourned with no further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts