MAHADEVAMMA vs NANJUNDA Advocate - M S POORNIMA — 87/2022
Case under U/o 21 Rule 2 of Cpc Section 2,. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
EX - Execution Petition Under Order
CNR: KAMS500035642022
Next Hearing
20th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
89/2022
Filing Date
17-12-2022
Registration No
87/2022
Registration Date
17-12-2022
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD
Judge
448-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MAHADEVAMMA
Adv. KUMAR. K.M.
PUTTARANGAMMA
KEMPANANJAMMA
JAYAMMA
Respondent(s)
NANJUNDA Advocate - M S POORNIMA
SOMANNA ALIAS RAMACHARI
Adv. M S POORNIMA
Hearing History
Judge: 448-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD
HEARING
HEARING
ORDERS
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | HEARING | |
| 07-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 07-02-2026 | ORDERS | |
| 24-01-2026 | HEARING | |
| 29-11-2025 | HEARING |
Interim Orders
The court granted the execution petition and issued a delivery warrant for the property share of the decree holders, contingent upon payment of prescribed fees (P.F.). The decree holders were entitled to a 1/3rd share in the scheduled property as per final decrees in FDP 9/2011 and FDP 13/2019, which the judgment debtors had failed to deliver despite the court orders, and the judgment debtors did not oppose the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court granted the execution petition and issued a delivery warrant for the property share of the decree holders, contingent upon payment of prescribed fees (P.F.). The decree holders were entitled to a 1/3rd share in the scheduled property as per final decrees in FDP 9/2011 and FDP 13/2019, which the judgment debtors had failed to deliver despite the court orders, and the judgment debtors did not oppose the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts