NAGAMMA vs RATHNAMMA — 273/2022

Case under Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 1. Status: Objections. Next hearing: 10th July 2026.

Objections Next hearing 10-Jul-2026

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS500034642022

Filing Number

269/2022

Filing Date

17-Nov-2022

Registration No

273/2022

Registration Date

23-Nov-2022

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD

Judge

448-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NAGAMMA

    Adv. MUNISUVRATHA. C.P., NAGARAJU. K.S.

  2. 2.YASHODAMMA

    Adv. MUNISUVRATHA. C.P.,NAGARAJU. K.S.

  3. 3.G. MAHADEVAPPA

    Adv. MUNISUVRATHA. C.P.,NAGARAJU. K.S.

  4. 4.MARAPPA

    Adv. MUNISUVRATHA. C.P.,NAGARAJU. K.S.

  5. 5.G. NAGAMALLAPPA

    Adv. MUNISUVRATHA. C.P.,NAGARAJU. K.S.

  6. 6.BASAVALINGAPPA

    Adv. MUNISUVRATHA. C.P.,NAGARAJU. K.S.

  7. 7.S.G. SAVITHA

    Adv. MUNISUVRATHA. C.P.,NAGARAJU. K.S.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RATHNAMMA

  2. 2.M. SUMA

  3. 3.VISHWAPRASAD

Case History

  1. 10-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Objections

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  4. 24-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    In OS 273/2022 dated 24.02.2026, the court heard witnesses and examined affidavits. The respondent's counsel confirmed the facts stated in the affidavit as true. The case was adjourned to allow the petitioners time for main arguments, and the court directed that the case file be produced before the court for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  7. 24-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  8. 02-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  9. 31-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  10. 17-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  11. 11-Aug-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  12. 11-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  13. 23-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  14. 05-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  15. 04-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  16. 18-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  17. 08-Jan-2025

    IssueView PDF

  18. 08-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  19. 26-Nov-2024

    Issues

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  20. 19-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  21. 03-Sep-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  22. 03-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  23. 08-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  24. 02-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  25. 02-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  26. 07-Jun-2024

    Written Statement

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  27. 01-Apr-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  28. 27-Feb-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  29. 21-Feb-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  30. 29-Sep-2023

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  31. 21-Jun-2023

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  32. 10-Mar-2023

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  33. 24-Feb-2023

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  34. 23-Nov-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 17-Nov-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 273/2022

casestatus.in Summary

In OS 273/2022 dated 24.02.2026, the court heard witnesses and examined affidavits. The respondent's counsel confirmed the facts stated in the affidavit as true. The case was adjourned to allow the petitioners time for main arguments, and the court directed that the case file be produced before the court for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case