M.L. VIJAY KUMAR vs N.L.RANGEGOWDA — 9/2022

Case under Order 20 Rule 18 for Final Decree Section 1. Disposed: Uncontested--CLOSED on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

FDP - Petitioner For Final Decree pr

CNR: KAMS500022262022

Filing Number

9/2022

Filing Date

23-Jun-2022

Registration No

9/2022

Registration Date

30-Jun-2022

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD

Judge

448-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CLOSED

Last updated 08-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Order 20 Rule 18 for Final Decree Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M.L. VIJAY KUMAR

    Adv. MAHESH BABU. A.P.

  2. 2.N.T. NAGARAJU

    Adv. MAHESH BABU. A.P.

  3. 3.N.K. SUNDARA(Legal Heir) 3.

  4. 4.GEETHA

    Adv. MAHESH BABU. A.P.3.

  5. 5.VIJAYALAKSHMI 3.

  6. 6.ROOPA 3.

  7. 7.RAMYA 3.

  8. 8.MANJULA

  9. 9.N.L. RAVIKUMAR(Legal Heir) 4.

  10. 10.P. PADMA 4.

  11. 11.RAGHAVENDRA N.R. 4.

  12. 12.REKHARANI 4.

  13. 13.VINAYAKA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.N.L.RANGEGOWDA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The court accepted the petitioner's memo and directed the office to draw a final decree allotting the petitioner's 1/3 share in the scheduled properties (survey numbers 364, 363, 362, 357/1 of Tayuru Village) as per the original 1993 judgment. The court found the commissioner's report unopposed by the respondent despite multiple hearing opportunities, and similarly accepted the petitioner's proposed allotment without objection, thereby closing the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  4. 05-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  5. 19-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  6. 15-Dec-2025

    Objections

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  7. 06-Dec-2025

    Objections

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  8. 22-Nov-2025

    Objections

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  9. 17-Oct-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  10. 17-Sep-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  11. 19-Jul-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  12. 11-Jun-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  13. 16-Apr-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  14. 28-Feb-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  15. 28-Jan-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  16. 03-Dec-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  17. 14-Oct-2024

    OrdersView PDF

  18. 14-Oct-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  19. 21-Sep-2024

    Orders

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  20. 27-Aug-2024

    Objections

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  21. 02-Aug-2024

    Hearing

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  22. 01-Jun-2024

    Objections

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  23. 06-Jan-2024

    Objections

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  24. 07-Oct-2023

    Objections

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  25. 15-Jul-2023

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  26. 30-Jun-2023

    Notice

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  27. 21-Apr-2023

    Notice

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  28. 04-Feb-2023

    Notice

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  29. 02-Dec-2022

    Notice

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  30. 17-Sep-2022

    Notice

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  31. 30-Jun-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 23-Jun-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 9/2022

casestatus.in Summary

The court accepted the petitioner's memo and directed the office to draw a final decree allotting the petitioner's 1/3 share in the scheduled properties (survey numbers 364, 363, 362, 357/1 of Tayuru Village) as per the original 1993 judgment. The court found the commissioner's report unopposed by the respondent despite multiple hearing opportunities, and similarly accepted the petitioner's proposed allotment without objection, thereby closing the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case