M.L. VIJAY KUMAR vs N.L.RANGEGOWDA — 9/2022
Case under Order 20 Rule 18 for Final Decree Section 1. Disposed: Uncontested--CLOSED on 07th March 2026.
FDP - Petitioner For Final Decree pr
CNR: KAMS500022262022
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
9/2022
Filing Date
23-06-2022
Registration No
9/2022
Registration Date
30-06-2022
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD
Judge
448-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CLOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M.L. VIJAY KUMAR
Adv. MAHESH BABU. A.P.
N.T. NAGARAJU
Adv. MAHESH BABU. A.P.
N.K. SUNDARA(Legal Heir) 3.
GEETHA
Adv. MAHESH BABU. A.P.3.
VIJAYALAKSHMI 3.
ROOPA 3.
RAMYA 3.
MANJULA
N.L. RAVIKUMAR(Legal Heir) 4.
P. PADMA 4.
RAGHAVENDRA N.R. 4.
REKHARANI 4.
VINAYAKA
Respondent(s)
N.L.RANGEGOWDA
Hearing History
Judge: 448-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
OBJECTIONS
OBJECTIONS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 05-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 19-01-2026 | HEARING | |
| 15-12-2025 | OBJECTIONS | |
| 06-12-2025 | OBJECTIONS |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court accepted the petitioner's memo and directed the office to draw a final decree allotting the petitioner's 1/3 share in the scheduled properties (survey numbers 364, 363, 362, 357/1 of Tayuru Village) as per the original 1993 judgment. The court found the commissioner's report unopposed by the respondent despite multiple hearing opportunities, and similarly accepted the petitioner's proposed allotment without objection, thereby closing the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court accepted the petitioner's memo and directed the office to draw a final decree allotting the petitioner's 1/3 share in the scheduled properties (survey numbers 364, 363, 362, 357/1 of Tayuru Village) as per the original 1993 judgment. The court found the commissioner's report unopposed by the respondent despite multiple hearing opportunities, and similarly accepted the petitioner's proposed allotment without objection, thereby closing the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts