PARVATHAMMA vs H J SHIVANNA — 350/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLEDC IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS500010222025

Filing Number

355/2025

Filing Date

25-Oct-2025

Registration No

350/2025

Registration Date

28-Oct-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD

Judge

448-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLEDC IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PARVATHAMMA

    Adv. TARAKARAMAN. K.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.H J SHIVANNA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The court allowed the compromise petition filed jointly by Parvathamma and defendants H.J. Shivanna and Rajamma under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the CPC, settling their partition dispute regarding the plaintiff's claimed 1/3rd share in scheduled property. The judge found the settlement was voluntary and free from coercion or fraud, and directed the office to draw a final decree accordingly and refund the full court fee to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  4. 03-Feb-2026

    Settlement

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  5. 29-Jan-2026

    Settlement

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  6. 28-Jan-2026

    Objections

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  7. 27-Jan-2026

    Objections

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  8. 20-Jan-2026

    Written Statement

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  9. 03-Nov-2025

    OrdersView PDF

  10. 03-Nov-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  11. 30-Oct-2025

    Orders

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  12. 28-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 25-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 350/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the compromise petition filed jointly by Parvathamma and defendants H.J. Shivanna and Rajamma under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the CPC, settling their partition dispute regarding the plaintiff's claimed 1/3rd share in scheduled property. The judge found the settlement was voluntary and free from coercion or fraud, and directed the office to draw a final decree accordingly and refund the full court fee to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case