PARVATHAMMA vs H J SHIVANNA — 350/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLEDC IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS500010222025
Filing Number
355/2025
Filing Date
25-10-2025
Registration No
350/2025
Registration Date
28-10-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD
Judge
448-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLEDC IN LOK ADALATH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PARVATHAMMA
Adv. TARAKARAMAN. K.
Respondent(s)
H J SHIVANNA
Hearing History
Judge: 448-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD
Disposed
SETTLEMENT
SETTLEMENT
OBJECTIONS
OBJECTIONS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 03-02-2026 | SETTLEMENT |
| 29-01-2026 | SETTLEMENT |
| 28-01-2026 | OBJECTIONS |
| 27-01-2026 | OBJECTIONS |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court allowed the compromise petition filed jointly by Parvathamma and defendants H.J. Shivanna and Rajamma under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the CPC, settling their partition dispute regarding the plaintiff's claimed 1/3rd share in scheduled property. The judge found the settlement was voluntary and free from coercion or fraud, and directed the office to draw a final decree accordingly and refund the full court fee to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court allowed the compromise petition filed jointly by Parvathamma and defendants H.J. Shivanna and Rajamma under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the CPC, settling their partition dispute regarding the plaintiff's claimed 1/3rd share in scheduled property. The judge found the settlement was voluntary and free from coercion or fraud, and directed the office to draw a final decree accordingly and refund the full court fee to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts