MARISIDDEGOWDA vs AKASH.S — 2405/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLEDC IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAMS500009182025
Filing Number
2405/2025
Filing Date
30-Aug-2025
Registration No
2405/2025
Registration Date
19-Sep-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD
Judge
448-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLEDC IN LOK ADALATH
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MARISIDDEGOWDA
Adv. A.C.PRAKASH
Respondent(s)
-
1.AKASH.S
-
2.SURESH.M.
-
3.ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: 2405/2025 The court accepted a joint settlement memo between petitioner Marisiddegowda and respondent No.3 (ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd.) for Rs. 4,20,000 in an insurance claim petition filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicle Act. The court found the settlement just, reasonable, and lawful, and disposed of the petition accordingly, directing that the full compensation amount be released to the petitioner upon deposit by respondent No.3. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
05-Mar-2026
Settlement
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
17-Jan-2026
Written Statement
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
15-Jan-2026
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
13-Nov-2025
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
19-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2405/2025
Case Summary: 2405/2025 The court accepted a joint settlement memo between petitioner Marisiddegowda and respondent No.3 (ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd.) for Rs. 4,20,000 in an insurance claim petition filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicle Act. The court found the settlement just, reasonable, and lawful, and disposed of the petition accordingly, directing that the full compensation amount be released to the petitioner upon deposit by respondent No.3. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts