KAMALAMMA vs LOHITH.L.M — 2231/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLEDC IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAMS500008642025

Filing Number

2231/2025

Filing Date

13-Aug-2025

Registration No

2231/2025

Registration Date

03-Sep-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD

Judge

448-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLEDC IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KAMALAMMA

    Adv. S UMESH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LOHITH.L.M

  2. 2.SHALINI.C.D.

  3. 3.NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD.,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The court accepted a joint settlement memo between petitioner Kamalamma and respondent No.3 (New India Assurance Co. Ltd.) for Rs. 4,25,000 in a Motor Vehicle Act Section 166 compensation claim. The petition was disposed of as per the settlement terms, with the full amount to be released to the petitioner upon deposit by the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Settlement

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  5. 17-Jan-2026

    Written Statement

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  6. 15-Jan-2026

    Written Statement

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  7. 13-Nov-2025

    Written Statement

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  8. 03-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 13-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2231/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court accepted a joint settlement memo between petitioner Kamalamma and respondent No.3 (New India Assurance Co. Ltd.) for Rs. 4,25,000 in a Motor Vehicle Act Section 166 compensation claim. The petition was disposed of as per the settlement terms, with the full amount to be released to the petitioner upon deposit by the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case