VINAY KUMAR.M vs NANDISH.A.C — 2168/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLEDC IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAMS500008622025
Filing Number
2168/2025
Filing Date
05-Aug-2025
Registration No
2168/2025
Registration Date
03-Sep-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD
Judge
448-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLEDC IN LOK ADALATH
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VINAY KUMAR.M
Adv. A.C.PRAKASH
Respondent(s)
-
1.NANDISH.A.C
-
2.MANJULA
-
3.UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD.,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
The court accepted a joint settlement memo between petitioner Vinay Kumar M and respondent United India Insurance Co. Ltd. (Respondent No.3) for Rs. 1,83,061 in a Motor Vehicle Act Section 166 claim petition. The court found the settlement just, reasonable, and lawful, and disposed of the petition accordingly, directing release of the compensation amount upon deposit by the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
05-Mar-2026
Settlement
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
19-Feb-2026
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
17-Jan-2026
Written Statement
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
15-Jan-2026
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
13-Nov-2025
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
03-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2168/2025
The court accepted a joint settlement memo between petitioner Vinay Kumar M and respondent United India Insurance Co. Ltd. (Respondent No.3) for Rs. 1,83,061 in a Motor Vehicle Act Section 166 claim petition. The court found the settlement just, reasonable, and lawful, and disposed of the petition accordingly, directing release of the compensation amount upon deposit by the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts