SHAMBULINGANAIKA vs ABDUL RAWOOF QURAISHI — 2263/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLEDC IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAMS500008602025
Filing Number
2263/2025
Filing Date
14-Aug-2025
Registration No
2263/2025
Registration Date
03-Sep-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD
Judge
448-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLEDC IN LOK ADALATH
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHAMBULINGANAIKA
Adv. R.M.SIDDARAJU
Respondent(s)
-
1.ABDUL RAWOOF QURAISHI
-
2.ARSHAD MUNAWAR
-
3.THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
The court accepted a joint settlement memo between petitioner Shambulinganaika and Respondent No.3 (The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.) for Rs. 2,90,000 in a Motor Vehicle Act Section 166 compensation claim. The petition was disposed of in terms of the settlement, with the court ordering release of the full amount to the petitioner upon deposit by the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
12-Mar-2026
Written Statement
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
05-Mar-2026
Written Statement
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
12-Feb-2026
Written Statement
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
18-Dec-2025
Written Statement
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
13-Nov-2025
Written Statement
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
03-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2263/2025
The court accepted a joint settlement memo between petitioner Shambulinganaika and Respondent No.3 (The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.) for Rs. 2,90,000 in a Motor Vehicle Act Section 166 compensation claim. The petition was disposed of in terms of the settlement, with the court ordering release of the full amount to the petitioner upon deposit by the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts