SIDDAMMA vs SIDDU — 264/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7R1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 12th August 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS500008172025
Filing Number
265/2025
Filing Date
20-Aug-2025
Registration No
264/2025
Registration Date
22-Aug-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD
Judge
448-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SIDDAMMA
Adv. MUTHURAJU
-
2.SIDDAMMA
-
3.SHIVAMMA
-
4.GOWRAMMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.SIDDU
-
2.SIDDARAJU
-
3.SHYLA
-
4.RAVINDRAKUMAR K S
-
5.ARUN KUMAR K.S.
Case History
-
12-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Jun-2026
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
02-Apr-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: OS/264/2025 Outcome: Temporary injunction GRANTED The court allowed the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction, restraining the defendants from alienating the scheduled properties in any manner until disposal of the partition suit. The court found the plaintiffs established a prima-facie case, balance of convenience favors them, and irreparable injury would result if the injunction were denied. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Apr-2026
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
17-Mar-2026
Orders
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
24-Feb-2026
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
30-Jan-2026
IssueView PDF
-
30-Jan-2026
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
04-Dec-2025
Written Statement
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
05-Nov-2025
Written Statement
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
10-Sep-2025
OrdersView PDF
-
10-Sep-2025
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
28-Aug-2025
Orders
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
22-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 264/2025
Case Summary: OS/264/2025 Outcome: Temporary injunction GRANTED The court allowed the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction, restraining the defendants from alienating the scheduled properties in any manner until disposal of the partition suit. The court found the plaintiffs established a prima-facie case, balance of convenience favors them, and irreparable injury would result if the injunction were denied. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts