UNION BANK OF INDIA vs KEMPANANJAMMA — 239/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7RULE1. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLEDC IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS500007462025

Filing Number

237/2025

Filing Date

01-Aug-2025

Registration No

239/2025

Registration Date

11-Aug-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD

Judge

448-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLEDC IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 7RULE1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UNION BANK OF INDIA

    Adv. S.BHIKAM CHAND.JAIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KEMPANANJAMMA

  2. 2.PAVITRA

  3. 3.NANJUNDASWAMY

  4. 4.RAJANNA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The dispute between Union Bank of India and respondents Kempananjamma, Pavitra, and Nanjundaswamy was settled through a settlement memorandum filed by the bank's counsel in Lok Adalath proceedings. The court accepted the settlement and directed full refund of court fees to the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Settlement

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Settlement

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  7. 14-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  8. 27-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  9. 29-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  10. 11-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 01-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 239/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The dispute between Union Bank of India and respondents Kempananjamma, Pavitra, and Nanjundaswamy was settled through a settlement memorandum filed by the bank's counsel in Lok Adalath proceedings. The court accepted the settlement and directed full refund of court fees to the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case