MANGALAMMA vs RAJAMMA — 202/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O,7,R,1. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLEDC IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS500006632025
Filing Number
205/2025
Filing Date
16-Jul-2025
Registration No
202/2025
Registration Date
18-Jul-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD
Judge
448-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLEDC IN LOK ADALATH
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MANGALAMMA
Adv. SRIKANTA H
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAJAMMA
-
2.NEELAMMA
-
3.BHAGYA
-
4.VASANTHA
-
5.RAJU H.D.
-
6.POOJA H.D.
-
7.KENDAGANNA SWAMY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
The dispute between Mangalamma (petitioner) and Rajamma, Neelamma, and Bhagya (respondents) was settled through the Lok Adalath (alternative dispute resolution mechanism) after the plaintiff's counsel filed a settlement memo. The case was disposed of based on the agreed settlement terms between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
30-Jan-2026
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
12-Nov-2025
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
16-Sep-2025
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
14-Aug-2025
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
28-Jul-2025
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
23-Jul-2025
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
21-Jul-2025
OrdersView PDF
-
21-Jul-2025
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
18-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 202/2025
The dispute between Mangalamma (petitioner) and Rajamma, Neelamma, and Bhagya (respondents) was settled through the Lok Adalath (alternative dispute resolution mechanism) after the plaintiff's counsel filed a settlement memo. The case was disposed of based on the agreed settlement terms between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts