SMT T C LALITHAMBA vs SRI PUTTASWAMY Advocate - Jagadeesh. D — 96/2019

Case under Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 7R1. Status: SUMMONS. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS500005942019

SUMMONS

Next Hearing

15th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

96/2019

Filing Date

05-08-2019

Registration No

96/2019

Registration Date

06-08-2019

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD

Judge

448-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD

Acts & Sections

order 7 rule 1 of CPC Section 7R1

Petitioner(s)

SMT T C LALITHAMBA

Adv. SRI. H. V. SREENATH

Respondent(s)

SRI PUTTASWAMY Advocate - Jagadeesh. D

Kumara

Hearing History

Judge: 448-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD

28-03-2026

SUMMONS

07-03-2026

SUMMONS

03-02-2026

SUMMONS

30-01-2026

SUMMONS

19-01-2026

SUMMONS

Interim Orders

08-08-2019
Orders
17-01-2020
Deposition
10-11-2020
Issue
23-05-2023
Orders
14-02-2024
Deposition
06-08-2024
Deposition
19-09-2024
Deposition
19-11-2024
Deposition
20-03-2025
Deposition

Summary: In OS 96/2019 heard on 20/03/2025 before the Senior Civil Judge at Nanjangud, a witness (Geeta M.P., a 63-year-old advocate from Mysore) was examined regarding a document (NP 6) that was notarized and signed by the plaintiff and defendant. The witness testified about preparing and notarizing the purchase agreement document with signatures from both parties. The court recorded the witness examination and marked the notarized document as exhibit NP 6 F. The case was adjourned as requested by the defending party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In OS 96/2019 heard on 20/03/2025 before the Senior Civil Judge at Nanjangud, a witness (Geeta M.P., a 63-year-old advocate from Mysore) was examined regarding a document (NP 6) that was notarized and signed by the plaintiff and defendant. The witness testified about preparing and notarizing the purchase agreement document with signatures from both parties. The court recorded the witness examination and marked the notarized document as exhibit NP 6 F. The case was adjourned as requested by the defending party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case