LOKESHWARI vs Rajashekar Hole Advocate - SRI. M. K. BASAVANNA — 16/2019

Case under Order 20 Rule 18 for Final Decree Section 20. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.

FDP - Petitioner For Final Decree pr

CNR: KAMS500005932019

HEARING

Next Hearing

24th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

15/2019

Filing Date

03-08-2019

Registration No

16/2019

Registration Date

05-08-2019

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD

Judge

448-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD

Acts & Sections

ORDER 20 RULE 18 FOR FINAL DECREE Section 20

Petitioner(s)

LOKESHWARI

Adv. SOMASHEKARA.S.T

Respondent(s)

Rajashekar Hole Advocate - SRI. M. K. BASAVANNA

Mahadevamma

Arun Kumar

Adv. SRI. M. K. BASAVANNA

RAJASHEKAR HOLE BASAPPA

Hearing History

Judge: 448-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD

07-03-2026

HEARING

17-01-2026

HEARING

03-12-2025

HEARING

18-11-2025

OBJECTIONS

26-09-2025

OBJECTIONS

Interim Orders

29-07-2024
Orders

Summary: The court allowed the petitioner's application (I.A.VII) to implead Rajashekar Hole Basappa as a necessary party in the final decree proceedings (FDP) of a partition suit. The court found that impleading the proposed respondent was essential for effective adjudication, particularly regarding allegations that the property khatha was fraudulently changed in his favor through collusion and forged documents. Notice is to be issued to the proposed respondent upon payment of court fees, with the case called on 24.09.2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed the petitioner's application (I.A.VII) to implead Rajashekar Hole Basappa as a necessary party in the final decree proceedings (FDP) of a partition suit. The court found that impleading the proposed respondent was essential for effective adjudication, particularly regarding allegations that the property khatha was fraudulently changed in his favor through collusion and forged documents. Notice is to be issued to the proposed respondent upon payment of court fees, with the case called on 24.09.2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case