UNION BANK OF INDIA vs S. MAHADEVASWAMY — 141/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order VII, Rule 1. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLEDC IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS500004732025
Filing Number
145/2025
Filing Date
05-06-2025
Registration No
141/2025
Registration Date
06-06-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD
Judge
448-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLEDC IN LOK ADALATH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
UNION BANK OF INDIA
Adv. S.BHIKAM CHAND.JAIN
Respondent(s)
S. MAHADEVASWAMY
S. GURUSWAMY
M. NAGARAJU
Hearing History
Judge: 448-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD
Disposed
SETTLEMENT
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | SETTLEMENT |
| 05-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 17-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 24-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
The dispute between Union Bank of India and S. Mahadevaswamy, S. Guruswamy, and M. Nagaraju was settled through Lok Adalath (alternative dispute resolution forum) after the bank's counsel filed a settlement memo signed by the bank's manager. The Lok Adalath accepted the settlement and directed refund of the full court fee. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The dispute between Union Bank of India and S. Mahadevaswamy, S. Guruswamy, and M. Nagaraju was settled through Lok Adalath (alternative dispute resolution forum) after the bank's counsel filed a settlement memo signed by the bank's manager. The Lok Adalath accepted the settlement and directed refund of the full court fee. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts