SMT S LOGAVIJAYA vs SMT RAJAMMA Advocate - NAGARAJU. K.S. — 60/2019
Case under Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 7R1. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLEDC IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS500003872019
Filing Number
60/2019
Filing Date
03-06-2019
Registration No
60/2019
Registration Date
06-06-2019
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD
Judge
448-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLEDC IN LOK ADALATH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SMT S LOGAVIJAYA
Adv. K S MRUTHUNAJAYA
Respondent(s)
SMT RAJAMMA Advocate - NAGARAJU. K.S.
Hearing History
Judge: 448-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD
Disposed
SETTLEMENT
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | SETTLEMENT |
| 11-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 05-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 04-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court allowed the compromise petition filed jointly by both parties under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure. S. Logavijaya's suit seeking specific performance of a contract to execute a sale deed was settled by mutual agreement, with the court finding no compulsion, coercion, or fraud in the settlement. The court directed that a decree be drawn accordingly and refunded full court fees to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court allowed the compromise petition filed jointly by both parties under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure. S. Logavijaya's suit seeking specific performance of a contract to execute a sale deed was settled by mutual agreement, with the court finding no compulsion, coercion, or fraud in the settlement. The court directed that a decree be drawn accordingly and refunded full court fees to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts