SAROJA vs HEMAVATHI R. — 100/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order VII, Rule 1. Status: Objections. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.

Objections Next hearing 21-Apr-2026 this date has passed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS500003302025

Filing Number

98/2025

Filing Date

05-Apr-2025

Registration No

100/2025

Registration Date

08-Apr-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD

Judge

448-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

Last updated 08-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order VII, Rule 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAROJA

    Adv. BASAVARAJU. C.L.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HEMAVATHI R.

Case History

  1. 21-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Objections

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    SUMMARY The court dismissed the application filed by Defendant Hemavathi (first defendant) seeking to transfer vehicle registration (Bharath Benz Truck KA-52-C-1732) from her deceased husband's name to her own. The court found that the defendant failed to produce sufficient documentary evidence to support her claims regarding loan repayment, insurance premiums, and road tax payments, and noted that granting the transfer before trial completion could facilitate property alienation and create further litigation. The court held that such matters should be adjudicated during the main partition suit rather than through interim orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  8. 03-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  9. 11-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  10. 10-Dec-2025

    Written Statement

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  11. 01-Dec-2025

    Objections

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  12. 26-Nov-2025

    Objections

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  13. 13-Nov-2025

    Objections

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  14. 04-Nov-2025

    IssueView PDF

  15. 04-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  16. 24-Oct-2025

    Issues

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  17. 14-Oct-2025

    Written Statement

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  18. 22-Sep-2025

    Written Statement

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  19. 15-Sep-2025

    Written Statement

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  20. 01-Sep-2025

    Written Statement

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  21. 19-Aug-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  22. 31-Jul-2025

    Objections

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  23. 23-Jul-2025

    Written Statement

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  24. 11-Jul-2025

    Written Statement

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  25. 04-Jul-2025

    Written Statement

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  26. 27-Jun-2025

    Written Statement

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  27. 18-Jun-2025

    Written Statement

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  28. 10-Jun-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  29. 08-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 05-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100/2025

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY The court dismissed the application filed by Defendant Hemavathi (first defendant) seeking to transfer vehicle registration (Bharath Benz Truck KA-52-C-1732) from her deceased husband's name to her own. The court found that the defendant failed to produce sufficient documentary evidence to support her claims regarding loan repayment, insurance premiums, and road tax payments, and noted that granting the transfer before trial completion could facilitate property alienation and create further litigation. The court held that such matters should be adjudicated during the main partition suit rather than through interim orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case