SAROJA vs HEMAVATHI R. — 100/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order VII, Rule 1. Status: OBJECTIONS. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS500003302025

OBJECTIONS

Next Hearing

21st April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

98/2025

Filing Date

05-04-2025

Registration No

100/2025

Registration Date

08-04-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD

Judge

448-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section Order VII, Rule 1

Petitioner(s)

SAROJA

Adv. BASAVARAJU. C.L.

Respondent(s)

HEMAVATHI R.

Hearing History

Judge: 448-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD

13-03-2026

OBJECTIONS

07-03-2026

EVIDENCE

06-03-2026

ORDERS

27-02-2026

EVIDENCE

25-02-2026

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

04-11-2025
Issue
07-03-2026
Orders

SUMMARY The court dismissed the application filed by Defendant Hemavathi (first defendant) seeking to transfer vehicle registration (Bharath Benz Truck KA-52-C-1732) from her deceased husband's name to her own. The court found that the defendant failed to produce sufficient documentary evidence to support her claims regarding loan repayment, insurance premiums, and road tax payments, and noted that granting the transfer before trial completion could facilitate property alienation and create further litigation. The court held that such matters should be adjudicated during the main partition suit rather than through interim orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY The court dismissed the application filed by Defendant Hemavathi (first defendant) seeking to transfer vehicle registration (Bharath Benz Truck KA-52-C-1732) from her deceased husband's name to her own. The court found that the defendant failed to produce sufficient documentary evidence to support her claims regarding loan repayment, insurance premiums, and road tax payments, and noted that granting the transfer before trial completion could facilitate property alienation and create further litigation. The court held that such matters should be adjudicated during the main partition suit rather than through interim orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case