REVAMMA vs BASAVANNA Advocate - SRI. M. MAHESH — 12/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order XLI, Rule 1. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 01st June 2026.
R.A. - Regular Appeals
CNR: KAMS500002242023
Filing Number
12/2023
Filing Date
06-Mar-2023
Registration No
12/2023
Registration Date
07-Mar-2023
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD
Judge
448-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
Decision Date
01-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.REVAMMA
Adv. M. J. SETHU RAO
Respondent(s)
-
1.BASAVANNA Advocate - SRI. M. MAHESH
-
2.MAHADEVAPPA
Adv. SRI. M. MAHESH
-
3.SHIVANANJAMMA
-
4.SWAMY
-
5.BASANTH
-
6.NAGANNA
-
7.SHIVANNA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Jun-2026
JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: Revamma vs. Basavanna & Others (RA 12/2023) The appellate court reversed the trial court's decision and dismissed the plaintiffs' suit for declaration of ownership of agricultural property. The court found the suit was not maintainable because: (1) necessary family members with interests in the undivided ancestral property were not joined as parties, making an effective decree impossible; (2) the plaintiffs failed to produce the original sale deed (only providing a certified copy) without explaining its non-production; and (3) the plaintiffs themselves admitted the property boundaries stated in the suit schedule were incorrect. Although the defendants did not provide evidence, the burden remained on plaintiffs to affirmatively prove their title, which they failed to do. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Jun-2026
Disposed
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
10-Apr-2026
Judgments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
23-Mar-2026
Judgments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
17-Mar-2026
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
24-Feb-2026
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
17-Feb-2026
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
20-Jan-2026
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
09-Jan-2026
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
16-Dec-2025
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
15-Nov-2025
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
10-Nov-2025
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
08-Nov-2025
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
08-Oct-2025
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
19-Aug-2025
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
16-Jul-2025
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
20-Jun-2025
Objections
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
07-Apr-2025
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
27-Mar-2025
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
29-Jan-2025
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
27-Nov-2024
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
24-Oct-2024
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
24-Sep-2024
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
20-Aug-2024
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
03-Apr-2024
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
05-Mar-2024
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
04-Dec-2023
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
27-Oct-2023
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
19-Sep-2023
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
20-Jun-2023
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
10-Mar-2023
OrdersView PDF
-
10-Mar-2023
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
09-Mar-2023
Orders
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
07-Mar-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 12/2023
Case Summary: Revamma vs. Basavanna & Others (RA 12/2023) The appellate court reversed the trial court's decision and dismissed the plaintiffs' suit for declaration of ownership of agricultural property. The court found the suit was not maintainable because: (1) necessary family members with interests in the undivided ancestral property were not joined as parties, making an effective decree impossible; (2) the plaintiffs failed to produce the original sale deed (only providing a certified copy) without explaining its non-production; and (3) the plaintiffs themselves admitted the property boundaries stated in the suit schedule were incorrect. Although the defendants did not provide evidence, the burden remained on plaintiffs to affirmatively prove their title, which they failed to do. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts