M. NAGAMANI vs M. NAGARAJU — 25/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order XXI, Rule 2. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLEDC IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

EX - Execution Petition Under Order

CNR: KAMS500002232025

Filing Number

23/2025

Filing Date

11-Mar-2025

Registration No

25/2025

Registration Date

12-Mar-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD

Judge

448-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLEDC IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 08-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order XXI, Rule 2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M. NAGAMANI

    Adv. BASAVARAJU. C.L.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M. NAGARAJU

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The Lok Adalath (alternative dispute resolution forum) settled an execution petition after the defendant was granted physical possession of the scheduled property as per a memo filed by the DHR (Defendant/Respondent). The execution petition was consequently closed as settled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Settlement

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  5. 07-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  6. 06-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  7. 25-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  8. 20-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  9. 23-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  10. 01-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  11. 06-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  12. 12-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 11-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 25/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Lok Adalath (alternative dispute resolution forum) settled an execution petition after the defendant was granted physical possession of the scheduled property as per a memo filed by the DHR (Defendant/Respondent). The execution petition was consequently closed as settled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case