DATTHATHREYA vs MAHADEVAMMA — 55/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order VII, Rule 1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 15th July 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 15-Jul-2026

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS500001612025

Filing Number

53/2025

Filing Date

21-Feb-2025

Registration No

55/2025

Registration Date

21-Feb-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD

Judge

448-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order VII, Rule 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DATTHATHREYA

    Adv. RAJESHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAHADEVAMMA

  2. 2.BHAGYALAKSHMI

  3. 3.NAGAMMA

  4. 4.JAYALAKSHMI

  5. 5.SOWBHAGYA

  6. 6.BASAVARAJU(Legal Heir) 6.

  7. 7.RATHNAMMA

  8. 8.LAKSHMI

  9. 9.SAVITHRI

  10. 10.SHRINIVASA

  11. 11.MANGALA

  12. 12.MAHADEVI

  13. 13.GANESHA(Legal Heir) 12.

  14. 14.CHANDRU

  15. 15.M. NAGARAJU

  16. 16.SHARADAMMA

  17. 17.M. NANJUNDASWAMY

  18. 18.M. RAJU

  19. 19.DODDAMMA

Case History

  1. 15-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  6. 08-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  7. 18-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  8. 24-Sep-2025

    OrdersView PDF

    Case 55/2025 Summary: Datthathreya sought a temporary injunction restraining defendants from preventing him from performing hereditary temple duties at Srikanteshwaraswamy Temple, Nanjangud, claiming succession to his deceased father's traditional position. The court rejected the application, finding the plaintiff failed to establish a prima-facie case due to lack of documentary evidence from temple authorities or the Deputy Commissioner authorizing him to perform the duty even temporarily, and noting that eligibility must be proven through trial evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 24-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  10. 06-Sep-2025

    Orders

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  11. 29-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  12. 21-Jul-2025

    Objections

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  13. 02-Jul-2025

    Objections

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  14. 21-Jun-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  15. 21-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  16. 13-Jun-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  17. 13-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  18. 04-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  19. 03-Jun-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  20. 03-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  21. 02-May-2025

    IssueView PDF

  22. 02-May-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  23. 17-Apr-2025

    Issues

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  24. 21-Mar-2025

    Issues

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  25. 10-Mar-2025

    Issues

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  26. 21-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 21-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 55/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 55/2025 Summary: Datthathreya sought a temporary injunction restraining defendants from preventing him from performing hereditary temple duties at Srikanteshwaraswamy Temple, Nanjangud, claiming succession to his deceased father's traditional position. The court rejected the application, finding the plaintiff failed to establish a prima-facie case due to lack of documentary evidence from temple authorities or the Deputy Commissioner authorizing him to perform the duty even temporarily, and noting that eligibility must be proven through trial evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case