KAMALAMMA vs NEELAMMA S. — 45/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7RULE1. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLEDC IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS500001232026

Filing Number

41/2026

Filing Date

29-Jan-2026

Registration No

45/2026

Registration Date

04-Feb-2026

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD

Judge

448-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLEDC IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 7RULE1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KAMALAMMA

    Adv. MAHADEVA PRASAD

  2. 2.MANJULA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NEELAMMA S.

  2. 2.MEENAKSHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary: O.S./45/2026 The court allowed the compromise petition filed jointly by plaintiffs Kamalamma and Manjula against defendants Neelamma S. and Meenakshi in a partition suit seeking 1/4th share of scheduled properties. The court found the settlement was freely agreed upon by all parties without coercion or fraud, and ordered the suit compromised according to the agreed terms. Full court fee was refunded to plaintiffs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  4. 18-Feb-2026

    Settlement

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  5. 04-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 29-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 45/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S./45/2026 The court allowed the compromise petition filed jointly by plaintiffs Kamalamma and Manjula against defendants Neelamma S. and Meenakshi in a partition suit seeking 1/4th share of scheduled properties. The court found the settlement was freely agreed upon by all parties without coercion or fraud, and ordered the suit compromised according to the agreed terms. Full court fee was refunded to plaintiffs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case