SHIVARAJU vs SHIVALINGU Advocate - JAGASHESH PRASAD — 20/2022

Case under Order 7 Rule 1 R/w Sec 26 of Cpc Section order7rule1R/WSec26ofCPC-73. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS500000452022

Filing Number

18/2022

Filing Date

13-Jan-2022

Registration No

20/2022

Registration Date

17-Jan-2022

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD

Judge

448-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECREED

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Order 7 Rule 1 R/w Sec 26 of Cpc Section order7rule1R/WSec26ofCPC-73

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHIVARAJU

    Adv. JAGADEESH

  2. 2.Sannamma

  3. 3.Maramma

  4. 4.Bhagyamma

  5. 5.Mangalamma

  6. 6.Sakamma

  7. 7.Rathnamma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHIVALINGU Advocate - JAGASHESH PRASAD

  2. 2.Tahasildhar

  3. 3.Speecial Land Acquisition Officer

    Adv. S. SWAMY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: OS/20/2022 Court Decision: The court decreed the plaintiffs' suit and granted them each a 1/8th share in the disputed agricultural property (Sy.No.81, measuring 1 acre 20 guntas) and equal shares in any compensation if the land is acquired by the government. The court rejected the defendant's claim that a 2006 partition deed precluded the current suit, finding the disputed property was never part of that earlier partition. The key reasoning was that although the land grant was issued in the defendant's name, it originated from an application filed by their deceased father, making it inherited property subject to equal division among all legal heirs under Hindu succession law, not the defendant's exclusive self-acquired property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Judgments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Judgments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    Judgments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  7. 04-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  8. 13-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  9. 18-Dec-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  10. 18-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  11. 05-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  12. 01-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  13. 22-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  14. 07-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  15. 28-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  16. 12-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  17. 29-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  18. 22-Jul-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  19. 22-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  20. 18-Jul-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  21. 18-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  22. 07-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  23. 04-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  24. 19-Mar-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  25. 19-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  26. 12-Feb-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  27. 12-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  28. 17-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  29. 14-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  30. 19-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  31. 07-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  32. 25-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  33. 20-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  34. 19-Dec-2023

    DepositionView PDF

  35. 19-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  36. 15-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  37. 27-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  38. 28-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  39. 16-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  40. 31-May-2023

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  41. 21-Apr-2023

    OrdersView PDF

  42. 21-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  43. 19-Apr-2023

    Orders

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  44. 18-Apr-2023

    Hearing

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  45. 14-Mar-2023

    DepositionView PDF

  46. 14-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  47. 14-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  48. 07-Sep-2022

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  49. 28-Jun-2022

    IssueView PDF

  50. 28-Jun-2022

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  51. 04-Jun-2022

    Issues

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  52. 31-Mar-2022

    Written Statement

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  53. 15-Feb-2022

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  54. 18-Jan-2022

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  55. 17-Jan-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  56. 13-Jan-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 20/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS/20/2022 Court Decision: The court decreed the plaintiffs' suit and granted them each a 1/8th share in the disputed agricultural property (Sy.No.81, measuring 1 acre 20 guntas) and equal shares in any compensation if the land is acquired by the government. The court rejected the defendant's claim that a 2006 partition deed precluded the current suit, finding the disputed property was never part of that earlier partition. The key reasoning was that although the land grant was issued in the defendant's name, it originated from an application filed by their deceased father, making it inherited property subject to equal division among all legal heirs under Hindu succession law, not the defendant's exclusive self-acquired property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case