VENKATESHA vs VISHALAKSHAMMA — 1/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O 7, RULE 1, OF, CPC. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS410033972025

Filing Number

653/2025

Filing Date

18-Dec-2025

Registration No

1/2026

Registration Date

05-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJANAGARA

Judge

444-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O 7, RULE 1, OF, CPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VENKATESHA

    Adv. PURUSHOTHAMA G S

  2. 2.HARISH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VISHALAKSHAMMA

  2. 2.BEBY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    DecreeView PDF

    Case Summary: Venkatesha & Harish v. Vishalakshamma & Beby (1/2026) The Civil Judge of K.R. Nagara accepted a compromise petition filed by both parties on 14th March 2026 through Lok-Adalath proceedings. The court decreed that the compromise petition stands as binding and is considered part of the final decree, with effect only upon the signatories. The court ordered refund of admissible court fees as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Compromise

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  6. 07-Jan-2026

    Summons

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  7. 06-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 18-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Venkatesha & Harish v. Vishalakshamma & Beby (1/2026) The Civil Judge of K.R. Nagara accepted a compromise petition filed by both parties on 14th March 2026 through Lok-Adalath proceedings. The court decreed that the compromise petition stands as binding and is considered part of the final decree, with effect only upon the signatories. The court ordered refund of admissible court fees as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case