PANDU vs BHAGEERATHA — 639/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O 7, RULE, 1, OF, CPC. Status: Call On. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

Call On Next hearing 22-Jun-2026 this date has passed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS410033702025

Filing Number

646/2025

Filing Date

16-Dec-2025

Registration No

639/2025

Registration Date

18-Dec-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJANAGARA

Judge

444-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O 7, RULE, 1, OF, CPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PANDU

    Adv. ASHOKA K.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHAGEERATHA

Case History

  1. 22-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-May-2026

    OrdersView PDF

  3. 02-May-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary: Pandu v. Bhageeratha (O.S./639/2025) Court: Principal Civil Judge & JMFC, Krishnarajanagar Order Date: 2 May 2026 Outcome Both interim applications for temporary injunction were allowed with mutual restraints. The court restrained the defendant from alienating or encumbering the property, while simultaneously restraining the plaintiff from interfering with the defendant's possession until suit disposal. Key Facts A property dispute over 8 acres in Keggere Village concerning title and possession. Pandu claims ancestral ownership with alleged fraudulent mutation in Bhageeratha's name; Bhageeratha relies on registered sale deeds, succession documents, and a 2016 relinquishment deed. Both sought injunctions—Pandu to prevent alienation, Bhageeratha to protect his possession. Court's Finding While the plaintiff raised a triable issue regarding title, the defendant established prima-facie possession backed by revenue records and registered documents. The court balanced competing interests by preserving the property's status quo, restraining alienation to prevent third-party complications while protecting the defendant's current possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 02-May-2026

    Call On

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    Order

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  6. 24-Mar-2026

    Order

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  7. 17-Mar-2026

    Argument

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    Objection

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  9. 05-Feb-2026

    Summons

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  10. 18-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 16-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 639/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Pandu v. Bhageeratha (O.S./639/2025) Court: Principal Civil Judge & JMFC, Krishnarajanagar Order Date: 2 May 2026 Outcome Both interim applications for temporary injunction were allowed with mutual restraints. The court restrained the defendant from alienating or encumbering the property, while simultaneously restraining the plaintiff from interfering with the defendant's possession until suit disposal. Key Facts A property dispute over 8 acres in Keggere Village concerning title and possession. Pandu claims ancestral ownership with alleged fraudulent mutation in Bhageeratha's name; Bhageeratha relies on registered sale deeds, succession documents, and a 2016 relinquishment deed. Both sought injunctions—Pandu to prevent alienation, Bhageeratha to protect his possession. Court's Finding While the plaintiff raised a triable issue regarding title, the defendant established prima-facie possession backed by revenue records and registered documents. The court balanced competing interests by preserving the property's status quo, restraining alienation to prevent third-party complications while protecting the defendant's current possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case