DEEPU K.S vs THAYAMMA — 360/2021
Case under U/o 7 Rule of 1 C.p.c. Section U/O VII RULE, I OF CPC. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS410030152021
Next Hearing
03rd June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
367/2021
Filing Date
18-09-2021
Registration No
360/2021
Registration Date
20-09-2021
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJANAGARA
Judge
1097-I ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KRISHNARAJANAGAR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DEEPU K.S
Adv. NUTHANKUMAR B K
VISHALAKSHI
SUDHARSHA K.S
Respondent(s)
THAYAMMA
THANUJA
ABHILASHA
SUDHAKARA
Hearing History
Judge: 1097-I ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KRISHNARAJANAGAR
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 06-01-2026 | HEARING | |
| 08-12-2025 | HEARING | |
| 05-11-2025 | HEARING | |
| 27-09-2025 | HEARING |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court dismissed the defendants' application seeking rejection of the plaint in a perpetual injunction suit (O.S.No.360/2021). The court held that the defendants' arguments—regarding co-ownership of the property, lack of title declaration, and absence of cause of action—lacked merit and could not be adjudicated in the injunction suit. The court noted that ownership disputes must be resolved in the pending partition suit (O.S.No.129/2018) before such objections could affect this suit. IA.No.3 was dismissed with each party bearing its own costs (dated 25 June 2025). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court dismissed the defendants' application seeking rejection of the plaint in a perpetual injunction suit (O.S.No.360/2021). The court held that the defendants' arguments—regarding co-ownership of the property, lack of title declaration, and absence of cause of action—lacked merit and could not be adjudicated in the injunction suit. The court noted that ownership disputes must be resolved in the pending partition suit (O.S.No.129/2018) before such objections could affect this suit. IA.No.3 was dismissed with each party bearing its own costs (dated 25 June 2025). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts