MANGALA vs SHIVANNA — 502/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section U/SEC.144,OF,BNS. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAMS410028112025

Filing Number

495/2025

Filing Date

12-Nov-2025

Registration No

502/2025

Registration Date

13-Nov-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJANAGARA

Judge

444-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section U/SEC.144,OF,BNS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANGALA

    Adv. H.S. DURGESH

  2. 2.LAVANYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHIVANNA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    In Case 502/2025 between petitioners Mangala and Lavanya against respondent Shivanna, the Lok-Adalath held on 14/03/2026 dismissed the petition as "Settled out of court" based on a memo filed by the advocate for the DHR, indicating the parties reached a settlement and resolved their dispute through conciliation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Compromise

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Objection

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  6. 21-Feb-2026

    Notice

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  7. 03-Feb-2026

    Notice

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  8. 20-Dec-2025

    Notice

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  9. 14-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 12-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 502/2025

casestatus.in Summary

In Case 502/2025 between petitioners Mangala and Lavanya against respondent Shivanna, the Lok-Adalath held on 14/03/2026 dismissed the petition as "Settled out of court" based on a memo filed by the advocate for the DHR, indicating the parties reached a settlement and resolved their dispute through conciliation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case