LAKSHMI vs KRISHNEGOWDA — 571/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O,7,RULE,1,OF,CPC. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS410028102025

Filing Number

579/2025

Filing Date

12-Nov-2025

Registration No

571/2025

Registration Date

13-Nov-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJANAGARA

Judge

444-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O,7,RULE,1,OF,CPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LAKSHMI

    Adv. H.S. DURGESH

  2. 2.LAVANYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KRISHNEGOWDA

  2. 2.SHIVANNA

  3. 3.GEETHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Orders

    The Lok-Adalath (14.03.2026) accepted the compromise petition filed by petitioners Lakshmi and Lavanya against respondents Krishnegowda, Shivanna, and Geetha under Section 23 R-3 of the CPC. The court, satisfied that all parties consented to the settlement terms with full understanding of consequences, directed the office to prepare a decree according to the compromise petition's terms, which shall bind only the signatories. Court fee refund was ordered as admissible under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    Compromise

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    Written Statement

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  6. 09-Jan-2026

    Written Statement

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  7. 14-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 12-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 571/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Lok-Adalath (14.03.2026) accepted the compromise petition filed by petitioners Lakshmi and Lavanya against respondents Krishnegowda, Shivanna, and Geetha under Section 23 R-3 of the CPC. The court, satisfied that all parties consented to the settlement terms with full understanding of consequences, directed the office to prepare a decree according to the compromise petition's terms, which shall bind only the signatories. Court fee refund was ordered as admissible under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case