Saligrama Police Station vs HARISH S. — 1060/2017

Case under Others Section 32,34,KE,ACE. Status: Bail. Next hearing: 05th October 2026.

Bail Next hearing 05-Oct-2026

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAMS410025632017

Filing Number

1061/2017

Filing Date

21-Nov-2017

Registration No

1060/2017

Registration Date

21-Nov-2017

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJANAGARA

Judge

1097-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

SAALIGRAMA PS

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Others Section 32,34,KE,ACE

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Saligrama Police Station

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HARISH S.

Case History

  1. 05-Oct-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Bail

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  3. 11-May-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: 1060/2017 Case: Saligrama Police Station v. Harish S. Court: 1st Additional Civil and JMFC, K.R. Nagar Outcome: Case proceeding with witness examination completed. A witness (Ganesh Prasad, age 30, businessman) testified on October 2, 2016, stating he had no knowledge of the accused (Rajagouda) or details of the incident. Cross-examination by the prosecution followed, after which the witness was discharged. The defense counsel had no cross-examination or re-examination. The court recorded the witness's fingerprint and the case proceeded according to normal trial procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  6. 02-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  7. 02-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  8. 02-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  9. 22-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  10. 04-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  11. 18-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  12. 19-May-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  13. 05-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  14. 19-Oct-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  15. 19-Oct-2024

    Summons

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  16. 09-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  17. 29-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  18. 15-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  19. 07-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  20. 13-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  21. 02-Sep-2023

    DepositionView PDF

  22. 02-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  23. 10-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  24. 06-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  25. 30-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  26. 19-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  27. 26-Aug-2022

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  28. 18-May-2022

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  29. 11-Feb-2022

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  30. 18-Nov-2021

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  31. 23-Aug-2021

    Framing Of Charge And Plea

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  32. 25-Jun-2021

    Framing Of Charge And Plea

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  33. 05-Apr-2021

    Framing Of Charge And Plea

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  34. 04-Jan-2021

    Framing Of Charge And Plea

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  35. 06-Oct-2020

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  36. 15-Jul-2020

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  37. 11-Jun-2020

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  38. 20-May-2020

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  39. 05-May-2020

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  40. 25-Feb-2020

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  41. 24-Dec-2019

    Framing Of Charge And Plea

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  42. 30-Sep-2019

    Framing Of Charge And Plea

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  43. 19-Jul-2019

    Framing Of Charge And Plea

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  44. 17-May-2019

    Framing Of Charge And Plea

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  45. 07-Mar-2019

    Framing Of Charge And Plea

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  46. 10-Jan-2019

    Framing Of Charge And Plea

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  47. 26-Oct-2018

    Framing Of Charge And Plea

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  48. 21-Aug-2018

    Framing Of Charge And Plea

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  49. 19-Jun-2018

    Issue Summons

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  50. 10-May-2018

    Issue Summons

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  51. 09-May-2018

    Issue Summons

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  52. 12-Mar-2018

    Issue Summons

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  53. 17-Feb-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  54. 21-Nov-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1060/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 1060/2017 Case: Saligrama Police Station v. Harish S. Court: 1st Additional Civil and JMFC, K.R. Nagar Outcome: Case proceeding with witness examination completed. A witness (Ganesh Prasad, age 30, businessman) testified on October 2, 2016, stating he had no knowledge of the accused (Rajagouda) or details of the incident. Cross-examination by the prosecution followed, after which the witness was discharged. The defense counsel had no cross-examination or re-examination. The court recorded the witness's fingerprint and the case proceeded according to normal trial procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case