EXCISE POLICE vs CHANDRU — 1118/2019
Case under Others Section US14(2),15,32(1),38(A)KEACT. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 15th May 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAMS410025562019
Next Hearing
15th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1118/2019
Filing Date
30-07-2019
Registration No
1118/2019
Registration Date
30-07-2019
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJANAGARA
Judge
444-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KRISHNARAJANAGAR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
EXCISE POLICE
Adv. BY STATE
Respondent(s)
CHANDRU
Hearing History
Judge: 444-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KRISHNARAJANAGAR
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
NBW TO ACCUSED
NBW TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 06-12-2025 | EVIDENCE | |
| 15-09-2025 | EVIDENCE | |
| 28-05-2025 | NBW TO ACCUSED | |
| 24-02-2025 | NBW TO ACCUSED |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: C.C. 1118/2019, Principal Civil Court & JMMF Court, K.R. Nagar Outcome: The case proceeded with examination of witness (Somashetti, age 55, Excise Sub-Inspector from Mysore) on 15.11.2022, who testified regarding seizure of contraband liquor (35 packets of Original Choice Whisky and 5 packets of Windsor Deluxe Whisky in 90ml tetra packs) from the accused on 21.07.2018. The witness identified seized exhibits and provided testimony about the raid conducted in the K.R. Nagar area. Cross-examination of the witness was completed, and no further cross-examination was required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: C.C. 1118/2019, Principal Civil Court & JMMF Court, K.R. Nagar Outcome: The case proceeded with examination of witness (Somashetti, age 55, Excise Sub-Inspector from Mysore) on 15.11.2022, who testified regarding seizure of contraband liquor (35 packets of Original Choice Whisky and 5 packets of Windsor Deluxe Whisky in 90ml tetra packs) from the accused on 21.07.2018. The witness identified seized exhibits and provided testimony about the raid conducted in the K.R. Nagar area. Cross-examination of the witness was completed, and no further cross-examination was required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts