K.N. RAMESH RAO KADAM vs ASHOK B.K. — 374/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O 7 RULE, 1 , AND 2, OF, CPC. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS410017462025
Filing Number
384/2025
Filing Date
21-Jul-2025
Registration No
374/2025
Registration Date
22-Jul-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJANAGARA
Judge
1097-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.K.N. RAMESH RAO KADAM
Adv. VIJAYAKUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.ASHOK B.K.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Orders
Case Summary: OS 374/2025 The case between K.N. Ramesh Rao Kadam (petitioner) and Ashok B.K. (respondent) was heard before the Lokadalath. The court allowed the plaintiff's memo and disposed of the case as amicably settled between the parties. The court also directed the office to refund the court fee to the plaintiff as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
03-Mar-2026
Compromise
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
28-Feb-2026
Compromise
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
13-Feb-2026
Plant Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
08-Dec-2025
Plant Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
01-Dec-2025
Plant Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
09-Oct-2025
Compromise
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
29-Aug-2025
Written Statement
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
23-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 374/2025
Case Summary: OS 374/2025 The case between K.N. Ramesh Rao Kadam (petitioner) and Ashok B.K. (respondent) was heard before the Lokadalath. The court allowed the plaintiff's memo and disposed of the case as amicably settled between the parties. The court also directed the office to refund the court fee to the plaintiff as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts