SHRUTHI B.M. vs KAMALA T.R — 409/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O 7, RULE 1, OF CPC. Status: Order. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS410014812023
Filing Number
408/2023
Filing Date
01-Sep-2023
Registration No
409/2023
Registration Date
02-Sep-2023
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJANAGARA
Judge
444-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHRUTHI B.M.
Adv. POORNIMA V
Respondent(s)
-
1.KAMALA T.R
-
2.MANJU S.K.
Case History
-
01-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
04-Jun-2026
Order
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
17-Mar-2026
Cross Examination
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
04-Mar-2026
Objection
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
02-Feb-2026
Cross Examination
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
03-Jan-2026
Cross Examination
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
28-Nov-2025
Cross Examination
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
24-Oct-2025
Cross Examination
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
02-Sep-2025
Cross Examination
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
29-Jul-2025
Cross Examination
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
02-Jun-2025
OrdersView PDF
Summary of Case 409/2023 - Shruthi v. Kamala T.R and Manju S.K. The court dismissed the defendants' preliminary application challenging the maintainability of plaintiff Shruthi's suit for specific performance of a property sale agreement dated 01.12.2018. The defendants argued the suit was time-barred under the Limitation Act's 3-year period; however, the court found the suit was filed within the statutory limitation period from the date the 3-year performance deadline commenced, making it maintainable. The matter was adjourned for cross-examination of PW-1. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Jun-2025
Cross Examination
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
15-Apr-2025
Order
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
18-Mar-2025
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
15-Feb-2025
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
20-Jan-2025
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
16-Dec-2024
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
06-Nov-2024
Objection
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
30-Sep-2024
Cross Examination
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
06-Aug-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
27-Jun-2024
Written Statement
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
29-May-2024
Written Statement
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
06-Apr-2024
Summons
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
09-Feb-2024
Summons
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
07-Dec-2023
Summons
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
07-Oct-2023
Summons
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
07-Sep-2023
Summons
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
05-Sep-2023
Order
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
04-Sep-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Sep-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 409/2023
Summary of Case 409/2023 - Shruthi v. Kamala T.R and Manju S.K. The court dismissed the defendants' preliminary application challenging the maintainability of plaintiff Shruthi's suit for specific performance of a property sale agreement dated 01.12.2018. The defendants argued the suit was time-barred under the Limitation Act's 3-year period; however, the court found the suit was filed within the statutory limitation period from the date the 3-year performance deadline commenced, making it maintainable. The matter was adjourned for cross-examination of PW-1. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts