V.M. ABU vs UMAR — 41/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O 21, RULE 2, OF CPC. Status: Objection. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
EX - Execution Petition Under Order
CNR: KAMS410013132024
Filing Number
40/2024
Filing Date
11-Jul-2024
Registration No
41/2024
Registration Date
12-Jul-2024
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJANAGARA
Judge
444-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.V.M. ABU
Adv. RAVI SHANKAR. L.V.
-
2.JAINAB
Respondent(s)
-
1.UMAR
Case History
-
12-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
28-Apr-2026
Objection
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
14-Mar-2026
Compromise
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
13-Mar-2026
Compromise
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
06-Mar-2026
Compromise
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
02-Mar-2026
Call On
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
11-Feb-2026
Order
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
28-Jan-2026
Objection
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
06-Nov-2025
Objection
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
24-Sep-2025
Objection
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
18-Sep-2025
Objection
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
02-Aug-2025
Steps
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
30-Jun-2025
Steps
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
16-Apr-2025
OrdersView PDF
Case 41/2024 Summary Outcome: Petition for execution of decree allowed and declared maintainable. The court rejected respondent Umar's objections challenging the petition's maintainability and ordered that execution proceedings continue. The court held that merely filing an appeal without obtaining a stay order does not bar the executing court from proceeding with decree enforcement; therefore, suitable orders will be passed to execute the partition decree allotting petitioners one share among ten shares in the scheduled property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Apr-2025
Steps
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
01-Apr-2025
Call On
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
01-Mar-2025
Call On
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
28-Feb-2025
Call On
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
22-Feb-2025
Call On
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
06-Feb-2025
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
29-Jan-2025
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
18-Jan-2025
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
07-Jan-2025
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
19-Dec-2024
Objection
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
06-Dec-2024
Objection
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
05-Nov-2024
Objection
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
12-Aug-2024
Notice
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
15-Jul-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Jul-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 41/2024
Case 41/2024 Summary Outcome: Petition for execution of decree allowed and declared maintainable. The court rejected respondent Umar's objections challenging the petition's maintainability and ordered that execution proceedings continue. The court held that merely filing an appeal without obtaining a stay order does not bar the executing court from proceeding with decree enforcement; therefore, suitable orders will be passed to execute the partition decree allotting petitioners one share among ten shares in the scheduled property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts