M.K ASHWATHANARAYANA vs KARTHIK — 181/2021

Case under U/o 7 Rule of 1 C.p.c Section ORDER 7, RULE I CPC. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS410009872021

Case disposed

Filing Number

181/2021

Filing Date

17-04-2021

Registration No

181/2021

Registration Date

19-04-2021

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJANAGARA

Judge

444-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KRISHNARAJANAGAR

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Acts & Sections

U/o 7 Rule of 1 C.p.c Section ORDER 7, RULE I CPC

Petitioner(s)

M.K ASHWATHANARAYANA

Adv. G.L. DHARMA

Respondent(s)

KARTHIK

DEEPAK

M.B DEVANATH

M.B SHIVAKUMARA

M.K SURESHA

PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER

Hearing History

Judge: 444-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KRISHNARAJANAGAR

14-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

COMPROMISE

06-02-2026

CROSS EXAMINATION

12-12-2025

COMPROMISE

10-12-2025

COMPROMISE

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
Orders

Case Summary: 181/2021 M.K Ashwathanarayana v. Karthik, Deepak, and M.B Devanath The Lok-Adalath (14.03.2026) accepted a compromise petition filed by all parties under Order 23 Rule 3 of the CPC. The court approved the settlement after the parties voluntarily agreed to its terms, which were explained in their regional/vernacular language. The compromise petition was incorporated into the decree as binding on the signatories, and the office was directed to refund applicable court fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

11-09-2023
Issue
23-02-2024
Exhibits
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 181/2021 M.K Ashwathanarayana v. Karthik, Deepak, and M.B Devanath The Lok-Adalath (14.03.2026) accepted a compromise petition filed by all parties under Order 23 Rule 3 of the CPC. The court approved the settlement after the parties voluntarily agreed to its terms, which were explained in their regional/vernacular language. The compromise petition was incorporated into the decree as binding on the signatories, and the office was directed to refund applicable court fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJANAGARA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case