Saligrama Police Station vs RAJEGOWDA — 564/2020
Case under Others Section US504,341,323,324,506,RW34IPC. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 05th August 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAMS410009202020
Filing Number
564/2020
Filing Date
11-Aug-2020
Registration No
564/2020
Registration Date
11-Aug-2020
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJANAGARA
Judge
1097-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Saligrama Police Station
Adv. BY STATE
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAJEGOWDA
-
2.LAKSHMANNA
-
3.BHARATHI
Case History
-
05-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
21-May-2026
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
22-Dec-2025
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
18-Nov-2025
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
15-Sep-2025
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
23-Jul-2025
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
07-May-2025
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
04-Mar-2025
DepositionView PDF
This is a criminal case heard in the Additional Civil and JMFC Court in K.R. Nagar involving Saligrama Police Station versus three respondents (Rajegowda, Lakshmanna, and Bharathi). The case concerns an alleged assault incident from September 1, 2019, where the accused allegedly attacked a person during a land dispute. The witness testimony contradicted the prosecution's account, with the witness claiming he witnessed nothing and later recanting his statement under cross-examination. The court recorded the witness's retraction as evidence (marked as Exhibit 3). The case proceedings were concluded with the court's observations documented in open court, and the witness testimony was electronically recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Mar-2025
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
23-Dec-2024
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
03-Oct-2024
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
25-Jul-2024
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
22-May-2024
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
25-Mar-2024
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
20-Jan-2024
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
17-Nov-2023
DepositionView PDF
-
17-Nov-2023
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
20-Sep-2023
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
05-Aug-2023
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
22-Jun-2023
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
03-Mar-2023
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
15-Oct-2022
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
18-Jun-2022
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
24-Mar-2022
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
17-Dec-2021
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
28-Oct-2021
Framing Of Charge And Plea
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
09-Aug-2021
Summons
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
26-Apr-2021
Summons
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
27-Jan-2021
Summons
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
02-Nov-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Aug-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 564/2020
This is a criminal case heard in the Additional Civil and JMFC Court in K.R. Nagar involving Saligrama Police Station versus three respondents (Rajegowda, Lakshmanna, and Bharathi). The case concerns an alleged assault incident from September 1, 2019, where the accused allegedly attacked a person during a land dispute. The witness testimony contradicted the prosecution's account, with the witness claiming he witnessed nothing and later recanting his statement under cross-examination. The court recorded the witness's retraction as evidence (marked as Exhibit 3). The case proceedings were concluded with the court's observations documented in open court, and the witness testimony was electronically recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts