APEKSHA vs CHIKKEGOWDA — 184/2018

Case under U/o 7 Rule of 1 C.p.c Section O7,R1,CPC. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 02nd May 2026.

Case disposed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS410008972018

Filing Number

185/2018

Filing Date

02-Jun-2018

Registration No

184/2018

Registration Date

02-Jun-2018

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJANAGARA

Judge

1097-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

Decision Date

02-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/o 7 Rule of 1 C.p.c Section O7,R1,CPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.APEKSHA

    Adv. T.G. THIMMEGOWDA

  2. 2.SAVITHA

    Adv. T.G. THIMMEGOWDA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHIKKEGOWDA

  2. 2.GAYATHRAMMA

  3. 3.PRAKASHA

  4. 4.SHIVANNA

  5. 5.LAKSHMI

  6. 6.MANJUNATHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-May-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: OS 184/2018 - Apeksha and Savitha v. Chikkegowda and Others Court Decision: The suit was dismissed. The court found that plaintiffs failed to prove the disputed properties were joint family or ancestral properties, and therefore lacked co-ownership rights to seek partition. Key Reasoning: Documents presented by the plaintiffs themselves (RTCs and mutation orders) demonstrated that the properties belonged absolutely to defendants No. 1 and 2 through purchase and inheritance (via will), not as joint family assets. Since plaintiffs could not establish co-ownership, they had no right to partition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-May-2026

    Disposed

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  5. 17-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  6. 16-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  7. 17-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  8. 19-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  9. 18-Dec-2025

    Judgement

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  10. 27-Nov-2025

    Judgement

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  11. 28-Oct-2025

    Judgement

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  12. 22-Sep-2025

    Judgement

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  13. 22-Aug-2025

    Judgement

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  14. 10-Jul-2025

    Judgement

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  15. 23-Jun-2025

    Argument

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  16. 11-Apr-2025

    Argument

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  17. 06-Mar-2025

    Argument

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  18. 28-Feb-2025

    Compromise

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  19. 20-Feb-2025

    Compromise

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  20. 11-Feb-2025

    Argument

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  21. 06-Jan-2025

    Argument

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  22. 27-Nov-2024

    Argument

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  23. 06-Nov-2024

    Argument

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  24. 25-Sep-2024

    Argument

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  25. 09-Aug-2024

    Argument

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  26. 03-Aug-2024

    Argument

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  27. 19-Jul-2024

    Argument

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  28. 04-Jul-2024

    Argument

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  29. 10-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  30. 02-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  31. 22-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  32. 08-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  33. 03-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  34. 07-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  35. 20-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  36. 09-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  37. 15-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  38. 08-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  39. 02-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  40. 05-Sep-2022

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  41. 21-Jun-2022

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  42. 04-Apr-2022

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  43. 01-Feb-2022

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  44. 25-Nov-2021

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  45. 12-Oct-2021

    Plant Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  46. 16-Aug-2021

    Plant Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  47. 16-Jul-2021

    Plant Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  48. 30-Jun-2021

    Plant Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  49. 29-Mar-2021

    Plant Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  50. 21-Jan-2021

    Plant Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  51. 23-Oct-2020

    Plant Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  52. 06-Aug-2020

    Plant Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  53. 18-Jun-2020

    Plant Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  54. 26-May-2020

    Plant Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  55. 27-Mar-2020

    Plant Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  56. 20-Feb-2020

    Plant Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  57. 13-Feb-2020

    Plant Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  58. 04-Jan-2020

    Plant Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  59. 25-Nov-2019

    DepositionView PDF

  60. 25-Nov-2019

    Plant Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  61. 23-Nov-2019

    Plant Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  62. 09-Oct-2019

    Plant Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  63. 30-Sep-2019

    Plant Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  64. 03-Aug-2019

    Plant Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  65. 04-Jul-2019

    Plant Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  66. 24-Apr-2019

    Plant Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  67. 25-Feb-2019

    Steps

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  68. 21-Jan-2019

    Steps

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  69. 19-Dec-2018

    Steps

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  70. 22-Nov-2018

    Steps

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  71. 27-Oct-2018

    Steps

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  72. 27-Sep-2018

    Steps

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  73. 04-Aug-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  74. 02-Jun-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 184/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS 184/2018 - Apeksha and Savitha v. Chikkegowda and Others Court Decision: The suit was dismissed. The court found that plaintiffs failed to prove the disputed properties were joint family or ancestral properties, and therefore lacked co-ownership rights to seek partition. Key Reasoning: Documents presented by the plaintiffs themselves (RTCs and mutation orders) demonstrated that the properties belonged absolutely to defendants No. 1 and 2 through purchase and inheritance (via will), not as joint family assets. Since plaintiffs could not establish co-ownership, they had no right to partition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case