A.P.SHIVAKUMAR vs L.B.SHIVAKUMAR — 51/2023

Case under U/o 21 Rule of Ii C.p.c. Section U/O 21, RULE OF 2, C.P.C.-61. Status: ARGUMENT. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.

EX - Execution Petition Under Order

CNR: KAMS410008592023

ARGUMENT

Next Hearing

22nd April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

50/2023

Filing Date

16-06-2023

Registration No

51/2023

Registration Date

17-06-2023

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJANAGARA

Judge

1097-I ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KRISHNARAJANAGAR

Acts & Sections

U/O 21 RULE OF II C.P.C. Section U/O 21, RULE OF 2, C.P.C.-61

Petitioner(s)

A.P.SHIVAKUMAR

Adv. B.PRABHUSWAMY

Respondent(s)

L.B.SHIVAKUMAR

K V SHIVAKUMAR

Hearing History

Judge: 1097-I ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KRISHNARAJANAGAR

07-03-2026

ARGUMENT

22-01-2026

ARGUMENT

12-12-2025

ARGUMENT

18-10-2025

EVIDENCE

20-09-2025

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

22-02-2025
Exhibits
20-09-2025
Deposition

Case Summary Court Order: E.X. No. 51/2023 The court heard witness examination on 20.09.2025 in a property dispute case. The court found that the plaintiff filed Original Case No. 60/2022 against the first defendant alleging fraudulent sale of a 40x60 sq.ft. property at a lower area than promised, and also filed a false miscellaneous petition (Misc No. 21/2024) with malicious intent to harass the defendant. The court rejected the plaintiff's claims as baseless and concluded there is no further hearing required in this matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Court Order: E.X. No. 51/2023 The court heard witness examination on 20.09.2025 in a property dispute case. The court found that the plaintiff filed Original Case No. 60/2022 against the first defendant alleging fraudulent sale of a 40x60 sq.ft. property at a lower area than promised, and also filed a false miscellaneous petition (Misc No. 21/2024) with malicious intent to harass the defendant. The court rejected the plaintiff's claims as baseless and concluded there is no further hearing required in this matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJANAGARA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case