MANJUNATHA vs KRISHNA — 170/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O 7, RULE 1, OF CPC. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 10th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS410006332024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
167/2024
Filing Date
18-03-2024
Registration No
170/2024
Registration Date
19-03-2024
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJANAGARA
Judge
1097-I ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KRISHNARAJANAGAR
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECREED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MANJUNATHA
Adv. M.C. SHASHIKANTH
Respondent(s)
KRISHNA
Hearing History
Judge: 1097-I ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KRISHNARAJANAGAR
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
ARGUMENT
CROSS EXAMINATION
CROSS EXAMINATION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 07-03-2026 | ARGUMENT | |
| 06-03-2026 | CROSS EXAMINATION | |
| 03-03-2026 | CROSS EXAMINATION |
Interim Orders
The court found the witness testimony credible and established that the plaintiff had loaned the defendant only ₹10,000, not ₹1 lakh as claimed, with the witness confirming repayment of the smaller amount. The court rejected the defendant's false claim of owing ₹1 lakh, noting the absence of supporting documentation and inconsistencies in the defendant's statements regarding the larger loan amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court found the witness testimony credible and established that the plaintiff had loaned the defendant only ₹10,000, not ₹1 lakh as claimed, with the witness confirming repayment of the smaller amount. The court rejected the defendant's false claim of owing ₹1 lakh, noting the absence of supporting documentation and inconsistencies in the defendant's statements regarding the larger loan amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts