LAKSHMAMMA vs BHAGYAMMA — 117/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O 7, RULE, 1 R/W 26 ,OF CPC.. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS410003662026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
117/2026
Filing Date
26-02-2026
Registration No
117/2026
Registration Date
27-02-2026
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJANAGARA
Judge
444-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KRISHNARAJANAGAR
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
LAKSHMAMMA
Adv. B.N. SATHISH
Respondent(s)
BHAGYAMMA
NANJUNDAIAH
RAMAIAH
Hearing History
Judge: 444-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KRISHNARAJANAGAR
Disposed
COMPROMISE
COMPROMISE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | COMPROMISE | |
| 28-02-2026 | COMPROMISE |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Lok-Adalath court accepted the compromise petition filed by both parties under Order 23 Rule 3 of the CPC, having confirmed their informed consent to the settlement terms. The court directed the office to prepare a decree based on the compromise petition's terms, with the petition forming part of the final decree and binding only the signatories, while court fees shall be refunded as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Lok-Adalath court accepted the compromise petition filed by both parties under Order 23 Rule 3 of the CPC, having confirmed their informed consent to the settlement terms. The court directed the office to prepare a decree based on the compromise petition's terms, with the petition forming part of the final decree and binding only the signatories, while court fees shall be refunded as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts