NASIR PASHA vs NOORJEB — 76/2022

Case under U/o 7 Rule of 1 C.p.c Section U/O VII RULE, I, CPC. Status: Compromise. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.

Compromise Next hearing 29-Apr-2026 this date has passed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS410002902022

Filing Number

77/2022

Filing Date

09-Feb-2022

Registration No

76/2022

Registration Date

10-Feb-2022

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJANAGARA

Judge

1097-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

Last updated 09-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

U/o 7 Rule of 1 C.p.c Section U/O VII RULE, I, CPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NASIR PASHA

    Adv. M.C. SHASHIKANTH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NOORJEB

  2. 2.NOOR ABJAKHANAM

  3. 3.MAHAMMUD NAVAJ KHAN

  4. 4.RASHEED NAVAJ KHAN

  5. 5.SHAYEED NAVAJKHAN

  6. 6.MAJEED NAVAJKHAN

  7. 7.HAMJED IKBAL KHAN(Legal Heir)

  8. 8.JAVEED KHAN

  9. 9.JAHED KHAN

  10. 10.ABEED IKBAL KHAN

  11. 11.NOUSHAD APREJ KHARAM

  12. 12.NOORASAYEED BEGAM

  13. 13.VALEEPASHA

  14. 14.HASEEN BEGAM

  15. 15.ANEESA BANU

  16. 16.BUSRA BANU

  17. 17.ROOMAN AHAMMED

  18. 18.JAHRA PATHIMA

Case History

  1. 29-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Compromise

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  3. 14-Jan-2026

    Compromise

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  4. 08-Dec-2025

    Compromise

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  5. 01-Dec-2025

    Compromise

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  6. 27-Nov-2025

    Compromise

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  7. 06-Nov-2025

    Compromise

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  8. 19-Sep-2025

    Cross Examination

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  9. 16-Aug-2025

    Amended Plaint

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  10. 31-Jul-2025

    Amended Plaint

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  11. 01-Jul-2025

    Notice

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  12. 21-Apr-2025

    Notice

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  13. 07-Mar-2025

    Notice

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  14. 01-Feb-2025

    OrdersView PDF

    SUMMARY: The court dismissed Defendant No. 15's application (IA No. 7) seeking rejection of the plaintiff's partition suit. The defendant argued the suit was barred by Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act (since no cancellation of a relinquishment deed was sought) and by limitation (8 years had passed since the deed's execution). The court found no valid grounds for rejection, holding that limitation is a mixed question of law and facts requiring a complete trial, and that a partition suit need not seek declaratory relief regarding a relinquishment deed. The application was dismissed with costs of Rs. 500. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  15. 01-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  16. 31-Jan-2025

    Order

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  17. 28-Jan-2025

    Order

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  18. 20-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  19. 09-Dec-2024

    Hearing

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  20. 22-Oct-2024

    Hearing

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  21. 25-Sep-2024

    Hearing

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  22. 10-Sep-2024

    Objection

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  23. 20-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  24. 19-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  25. 03-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  26. 15-Jun-2024

    Amended Plaint

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  27. 22-Apr-2024

    Amended Plaint

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  28. 08-Apr-2024

    Amended Plaint

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  29. 27-Mar-2024

    Amended Plaint

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  30. 12-Feb-2024

    Amended Plaint

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  31. 02-Jan-2024

    Amended Plaint

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  32. 27-Nov-2023

    Amended Plaint

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  33. 27-Sep-2023

    Cross Examination

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  34. 08-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  35. 01-Jun-2023

    IssueView PDF

  36. 01-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  37. 06-Apr-2023

    Call On

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  38. 14-Mar-2023

    Issues

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  39. 18-Jan-2023

    Issues

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  40. 29-Nov-2022

    Compromise

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  41. 21-Nov-2022

    DepositionView PDF

  42. 21-Nov-2022

    Argument

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  43. 06-Sep-2022

    Plant Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  44. 06-Aug-2022

    Written Statement

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  45. 13-Jul-2022

    Written Statement

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  46. 03-Jun-2022

    Written Statement

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  47. 24-Mar-2022

    Summons

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  48. 14-Feb-2022

    OrdersView PDF

  49. 14-Feb-2022

    Summons

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  50. 11-Feb-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  51. 09-Feb-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 76/2022

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The court dismissed Defendant No. 15's application (IA No. 7) seeking rejection of the plaintiff's partition suit. The defendant argued the suit was barred by Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act (since no cancellation of a relinquishment deed was sought) and by limitation (8 years had passed since the deed's execution). The court found no valid grounds for rejection, holding that limitation is a mixed question of law and facts requiring a complete trial, and that a partition suit need not seek declaratory relief regarding a relinquishment deed. The application was dismissed with costs of Rs. 500. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case